Opus 059, 3 Quartets in F major, E minor and C major for 2 violins, viola and cello

Opus 59, 3 Quartets in F major, E minor, and C major for two violins, viola, and cello, op. 59, composed by order of Count Andreas Rasumowsky and dedicated to him, 1805–1806, published in separate sets in Vienna. Bureau d’arts et d’industrie, January 1808; in score by Offenbach s/m., André, 1830. GA. nn. 43–45 (series 6/7–9) – B. 59 – KH. 59 – L. Ili, p. 14 – N. 59 – T. 127.

Official title: Opus 59 Drei Quartette (F-dur, e-moll, C-dur) für zwei Violinen, Viola und Violoncello Widmung: Andreas Kyrillowitsch Graf Rasumowsky NGA VI14 AGA 43-45 = Serie 6/7-9 Beinamen: Rasumowsky-Quartette, Nr. 3 Heldenquartett

The original manuscripts of the first and second quartets are held in the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek in Berlin; that of the third is in the Beethovenhaus. The sketches are contained on two sheets physically included in the Fidelio notebook (see Opus 72 – Biamonti 434) though they do not belong to it. The Finale of the first Quartet and the Trio of the Scherzo of the second are based on two Russian folk themes, as indicated in the score. Did the master wish, by doing this, to pay a tribute on his own initiative to the noble commissioner, or was he responding to an explicit request? An article in the Allgemeine Musik-Zeitung of 1802, notes Thayer-Riemann, had spoken about Russian music; and communications between Vienna, Moscow, and St. Petersburg were fairly easy (naturally relative to the times) for folk song collections to be sent.

Nottebohm cites the two themes as belonging to a collection by Ivan Pratsch, from 1790, marked by Beethoven himself in a copy he owned. But perhaps, beyond these two thematic-literal “quotations,” other points reveal in the melodic shapes, rhythmic and harmonic attitudes something that can give a sensitive listener the impression of a world of fantasy different (we would say “exotic” if that word did not evoke too superficial images or ideas) from the Western classical one. It is therefore understandable that some scholars thought of other Russian folk origins, for example in the setting of the theme of the opening Allegro and in the rhythm and some melodies of the Allegretto of the first quartet (we also think in the Scherzo and Finale of the second, in the Andante of the third) based on themes and forms Beethoven could also have known directly from family members of the same Rasumowsky embassy. But, aside from any more or less possible hypothesis about the reason for the special character of op. 59, it is certain that this, for its breadth, variety, mastery of forms, intensity of inspiration, and beauty of sonorities and instrumental effects, constitutes one of the greatest creations of Beethoven’s middle period.

[By Biamonti Giovanni – Chronological and thematic catalogue of Beethoven’s works including unpublished and unused sketches, Turin]

Origin and publication: Written around April/May to November 1806. The autograph score of the quartet in F major, which was composed first, bears the autograph date „angefangen am 26ten Maj – 1806“. The original edition in parts was published in January 1808 by the Kunst-und Industrie-Comptoir in Vienna and by Schreyvogel in Pest. A letter from October 1804 to Breitkopf & Härtel provides the first indication that Beethoven intended to return to the quartet genre after the Opus 18 quartets, from several years before.
„Denn könnten Sie mir auch Ihre Meinung wegen Quartetten für Violin sagen, und wie hoch sie wohl 2 oder 3 annehmen können. Ich kann Ihnen diese zwar nicht gleich geben aber ich würde selbe für Sie bestimmen“ (BGA 194, October 10, 1804). Despite the publisher’s response in November showing some interest, Beethoven asked his brother Kaspar Karl to write to the publisher to delay the timeline, as the project of revising Leonore was fully absorbing him (BGA 198 and 199). In March 1806, having completed the first major revision of Leonore, he returned to working on the quartets. Perhaps this was done on behalf of the subsequent dedicatee, Count Rasumowsky. As for the commission from the count, no documentation survives except for a letter, now lost, in which Beethoven announced the second quartet would be sent and requested payment (summary of the letter in Katalog/Music Loan 1904, page 306).

The use of Russian melodies in the first two quartets can be seen as a gesture of particular attention towards the client (the melodies are found in the collection of Russian folk songs by N.A. Lwow and Ivan Prac, see WoO 158 as an example and Hübsch/Op59). As Alan Tyson points out, unlike op. 18, here Beethoven composes the quartets in the order in which they later appeared (Tyson/Op59). On July 5, 1806 Beethoven wrote to Breitkopf:
„auch können sie sich mit demselben [seinem Bruder Kaspar Karl] auf neue violin quartetten einlaßen, wovon ich eins schon vollendet und jezt fast meistens mich gedenke mit dieser Arbeit zu beschäftigen“ (BGA 254).
And on September 3 he offered: „sobald ich ihre Meynung hierüber weiß – können sie also gleich von mir 3 Violin quartetten […] haben“ (BGA 256).
A closer examination of the sketches, however, shows that by the end of October 1806 only a full score in F major of the first two movements of the E minor quartet was available, while the remaining movements of this and the first movement of the C major quartet were only sketched (Tyson/Op59 and JTW pp. 524-526).

Since Beethoven composed other major works (including Op. 61, completed in November/December of the previous year) by February 1807—when the quartets had already been performed in Vienna (see first performance)—it is likely that the quartets were completed in November 1806. For Beethoven’s efforts to publish Opp. 58 through 62 simultaneously in the German, Austrian, English, and French markets, see Op. 58. Contrary to what was reported in the Zeitung für die elegante Welt on 10 December 1807, these „sechs neuen großen Werke“ (including the piano version of Op. 61) were not published simultaneously at Easter by the Kunst- und Industrie-Comptoir. An announcement in the Wiener Zeitung of 9 January 1808 initially mentioned only Op. 59 and Op. 62 as „neu erschienen“. Eventually, separate announcements were issued: for Op. 59 on 23 January 1808 and for Op. 62 on 10 February 1808.

Around the same time, the Leipziger Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung reported, in an article dated 16 January: „Beethovens neue grosse Quartetten dem Grafen Rasu-movsky zugeeignet, […] sind jetzt im Schreyvogelschen Industriecomptoir erschienen“. A report from Vienna, published in January 1808 in the Journal des Luxus und der Moden (with a reference to the Missa Op. 86, probably datable to late August or early September 1807), suggests that the quartets were engraved during the second half of 1807:
„Mit dem größten Vergnügen gebe ich Ihnen die Nachricht, daß unser Beethoven so eben eine außerordentlich schöne, ganz seiner würdige, Messe vollendet hat, welche am Feste Mariä bei dem Fürsten Esterhazy aufgeführt werden soll. Beethovens Oper Fidelio […] soll nächstens in Prag mit einer neuen Ouvertüre aufgeführt werden. Die 4te Symphonie von ihm ist im Stiche, so auch eine sehr schöne Ouvertüre zum Coriolan, auch ein großes Violin-Concert; dabei fängt er bereits eine zweite Messe an; auch 3 Quartetten werden gestochen. – Sie sehen daraus, wie rastlos thätig der geniale Künstler ist.“ (Journal des Luxus und der Moden, vol. 23, 1808, p. 29.)
Cooper’s hypothesis that the quartets had already been engraved by August 1807 cannot be confirmed (and is likely the result of a mistranslation of the phrase „werden gestochen“ as “have been engraved” rather than “are being engraved”; see Cooper/Clementi, p. 348).

The Muzio Clementi edition of Op. 59 (ca. 1809) is, according to Alan Tyson, not based on a manuscript engraving model but on the original Viennese edition (Tyson/Editions, p. 53). Nevertheless, in May 1807 Beethoven sent a copy of these works to London as quickly as possible—possibly in a parcel shipped that September—containing parts copied from the original edition that could be used as an engraving model (Cooper/Clementi, pp. 347f). In this context, Beethoven also wrote to Count Franz Brunsvik in Ofen (Buda) on 11 May 1807:
„ich brauche lieber B. die quartetten, ich habe schon deine Schwester deswegen gebeten, dir deshalb zu schreiben Es dauert zu lang, bis sie aus Meiner Partitur kopirt – eile daher und schike sie mir nur gerade mit der Briefpost — du erhältst sie in höchstens 4 oder 5 Tägen zurück — ich bitte dich dringend darum, weil ich sonst sehr viel dadurch verliehre[n] kann […] schicke Morgen gleich die quartetten – quar – tetten – t — e-t-t-e — n“ (BGA 281).

The original metronome markings cited in the incipits come from a booklet published by S. A. Steiner around 1817, titled Bestimmung des musikalischen Zeitmasses nach Mälzel’s Metronom. Zweite Lieferung. Beethoven. Sämmtliche Quartetten von dem Author selbst bezeichnet (VN 2812; copy held at US NYp). This publication includes tempo indications for the quartets up to Op. 95, some of which also appeared in Hofmeister/Index 1819 (see Nottebohm/Beethoveniana II, pp. 519–521; Weinmann/Senefelder, vol. 1, p. 157).

The nickname “Heldenquartett” (“Heroic Quartet”) often attributed to the third quartet is frequently associated with a marginal note by Beethoven found among the sketches for the final movement:
„Eben so wie du dich hier in den Strudeln / der Gesellschaft stürzest, eben so / möglich ist’s opern troz allen gesell- / schaftlichen Hindernißen zu schreiben – / Kein Geheimniß sey dein nichthören / mehr – auch bey der Kunst“.
This annotation presumably characterizes the (first and) final movement of the quartet.

Dedication: Andreas Kyrillowitsch Count Rasumowsky, born on 2 November 1752 (22 October according to the Julian calendar then used in Russia) in Saint Petersburg and deceased on 23 September 1836 in Vienna, was the son of Field Marshal Count Kyrill Grigoriewitsch Rasumowsky (1728–1803) and his wife Katharina Ivanovna, née Narishkin (1731–1777). A prominent diplomat, Rasumowsky served as the Russian ambassador to the Austrian court from 1792 to 1806 (with a brief interruption in 1800/01), and was elevated to the rank of prince in 1815.
On 4 November 1788, Rasumowsky married Elisabeth Countess of Thun-Hohenstein (1764–1806), elder sister of Princess Maria Christiane Lichnowsky (see Op. 43) and daughter of Countess Wilhelmina of Thun-Hohenstein (1744–1800; see Op. 11). On 10 February 1816, he contracted a second marriage with Constanze Countess von Thürheim (1785–1867).
The Palais Rasumovsky became a prominent cultural venue, hosting numerous festivals, concerts, and soirées, and was also used for official receptions during the Congress of Vienna by Tsar Alexander I.

1810 Paris Imbault, Plate number 883. From the London publication by Cianchettini & Sperati. Plate also used by Janet and Cotelle around 1812. Property of the Luca Moretti Music Archive.

1810 Paris Imbault, Plate number 883. From the London publication by Cianchettini & Sperati. Plate also used by Janet and Cotelle around 1812. Property of the Luca Moretti Music Archive.

From 1808 to 1816, Rasumowsky maintained a private string quartet led by Ignaz Schuppanzigh (with Ludwig Sina, Franz Weiß, and Joseph Linke), in which he occasionally played the violin himself and often performed Beethoven’s quartets. Beethoven likely came into contact with Rasumowsky through his relationship with the Lichnowsky family and with Wilhelmine von Thun. According to the diary of Count Zinzendorf, Beethoven played piano with Rasumowsky on 23 April 1795 (Kopitz/Cadenbach, vol. 2, p. 1114). Both the Count and his wife were subscribers to the Opus 1 piano trios.

In 1814, Rasumowsky arranged for the manuscript of “Wellingtons Sieg”, Op. 91, to be delivered to the Prince Regent of England (later King George IV), to whom the work was to be dedicated. Alongside Prince Lobkowitz, he was the dedicatee not only of the Op. 59 string quartets but also of Beethoven’s Fifth and Sixth symphonies (see Op. 18).

The first performances likely took place at the beginning of 1807 in private or semi-public settings, as suggested by a report dated 27 February 1807 in the Leipziger Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung:

„Auch ziehen drey neue, sehr lange und schwierige Beethovensche Violinquartetten, dem russischen Botschafter, Grafen Rasumovsky zugeeignet, die Aufmerksamkeit aller Kenner an sich. Sie sind tief gedacht und trefflich gearbeitet, aber nicht allgemeinfasslich – das 3te, aus C-dur, etwa ausgenommen, welches durch Eigenthümlichkeit, Melodie und harmonische Kraft jeden gebildeten Musikfreund gewinnen muss.“

On 5 May 1807, another brief notice followed:

„In Wien gefallen Beethovens neueste, schwere, aber gediegene Quartetten immer mehr; die Liebhaber hoffen sie bald gestochen zu sehn“ (AmZ, vol. 9, 1806/07, 5 May 1807, col. 517).

The diary entries of the painter Joseph Stieler indicate that the Schuppanzigh Quartet was among the first to perform the quartets:

„9. Aprill [1807] Im quartete des Schupanzigs, was so vollkommen ist als man nur ein quartet hören kan, habe ich ein neues quartette von Bethoven aus E mol [Op. 59 Nr. 2] gehört, welches von außerordentlicher Schönheit ist.“

However, Stieler also notes that other ensembles performed the new quartets, such as on 13 April 1807, when a string quartet featuring Karl Traugott Zeuner (1775–1841) and Conradin Kreutzer played one of the works.

1 Sketches from 1806 (see JTW pp. 524-526): (1) Nos. 1-3: A-Wgm, A 36, on 25 leaves of the folder. Facsimile p.14: Tyson/Op59 p.119, partial transcriptions: Nottebohm/Beethoveniana ll p.82-90 and Tyson/Op59; for details of the contents, see Tyson/Op59 and JTW pp. 524-526; on page 27f of the folder see DelMar/Op59 Critical Commentary on page 16. (2) no. 1: D-B, Mus. SM. autogr. Beethoven Mend.-Stift. 15 (“Mendelssohn 15”, “Leonore”), sketches on leaves not originally belonging to the book, pp. 183-186 and 346. Facsimile: SBB/ description: Klein/catalogue pp. 255 and 277, partial report: Nottebohm/Beethoveniana ll pp. 79-81. (3) no. 2: D-B, Mus. SM. autogr. Beethoven Landsberg 10, pp. 39-46. Facsimile: SBB/ partial transcription: Virneisel/Sketchbooks p. 436. (4) n. 2: D-B, Mus. SM. autogr. Beethoven Grasnick 20b, folios 18-19. Sample: SBB/ online.

Opus 59 Quartet No. 1 in F major for two violins, viola and cello

I) Allegro – II) Allegretto vivace e sempre scherzando – III) Adagio molto e mesto – IV) Allegro

The melodic-linear treatment of the initial and principal theme (an untroubled, cheerful song resting upon a pulsating chordal foundation, with little concern for harmonic progression) resembles, as Bücken notes, “the multi-voiced music in the style of the organum, still common among the Russian people today.” Various thematic elements mark the gradual transition to the second theme, which complements the first by providing greater melodic fullness. Yet, it soon gives way again to the prevailing motion, which is interrupted by a typical alternation of chords between the violins on one side, and the viola and cello on the other—a device that, though in a different expressive context, also appears in the first movement of the Fifth Symphony. This leads to the clear and decisive cadence in C major that concludes the exposition.

In the extensive and varied development and coda, all of these secondary elements—thus far presented primarily in a linear fashion—gradually enter into closer interplay both with each other and with the ever-present principal theme. They merge into a serene and joyful expression, which defines the overall character of the movement.

The Allegretto vivace e sempre scherzando, which follows as the second movement, is a page of rare artistic delicacy, shaped by poetic imagination and technical refinement. Over the pulse of a rhythmic theme—unchanging in its core structure but continually varied in appearance—sweet melodic figures are exchanged among the instruments. The final of these assumes the character of a melancholic, sentimental song: a mere detail within the broader form, yet one that contributes decisively to its individuality. Thayer-Riemann suggests it may be of Russian origin, though we are in no position to confirm this. A similar motif can be found in the Matador Chorus of La Traviata. There is an expressive affinity with other Beethovenian themes, notably in the finales of the Violin Concerto, Op. 61, and the String Quartet, Op. 95, as previously observed.

The Adagio molto e mesto recalls the Funeral March from the Eroica Symphony, though it is less somber and more lyrically open. At its core lies a mournful theme, developed in a manner that has rightly been described as melodic polyphony. A second theme in the major mode serves only briefly to soften the movement’s lamenting outpouring, which is abruptly cut short at the very end by a cadential passage for the first violin that introduces the final movement.

This final movement, as previously mentioned, is based on a Russian theme of strong rhythmic consistency. However, it cannot be assigned a distinctly joyful or sorrowful character; rather, the composer shapes it alternately in one direction or the other, integrating it with two additional (original) themes. The first appears in the second violin, supported by the pulsating octaves of the first violin and offbeat responses in the lower instruments. It is later transposed to the minor mode in the cello and first violin. The second theme is even more rhythmically defined and square in phrasing, articulated in the lower strings beneath the brilliant figuration of the upper instruments—and later vice versa.

Taken as a whole, this movement presents considerable instrumental interest, though it is perhaps less internally rich than the preceding three. Schering draws a literary parallel between this quartet and Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister. He suggests the following correspondences:

  • First movement: Book II, Chapters 1–3 – Lotte in the soul of the young Wilhelm Meister

  • Second movement: Book II, Chapter 8 – Mignon’s dance before Wilhelm Meister

  • Third movement: Book II, Chapter 13 – The Harpist’s Song: “Who gives himself to solitude…”

  • Fourth movement: Book II, Chapter 4 – Procession of acrobats and jugglers

Opus 59 Quartet No. 2 in E minor for two violins, viola and cello

I) Allegro – II) Molto adagio – III) Allegretto – IV) Finale – Presto

The Allegro possesses an agitated and melancholic character. The first theme, introduced with the imperative force of two chords characterized by a leap of a fifth, unfolds briefly with very concise auxiliary elements. The second theme also offers only a short melodic effusion before continuing into motion-driven figures. Among these, a crescendo built on syncopated rhythms over a rich progression of chords prefigures the one found in the Trio of the Scherzo from the Seventh Symphony. In the development section—based on the same materials, excluding the second theme—the sense of unrest increases, culminating in the recapitulation, which is driven with dramatic fervor through a unison passage. The Coda functions as a condensed and more intense secondary development, sealed by the impetuous final outburst of the theme.

It is said that Beethoven conceived the idea for the Adagio during a night walk through the countryside near Baden, gazing at the starry sky and “reflecting on the harmony of the spheres.”

Regardless of the anecdote, it is undeniable that the movement in question—marked in the score as to be played con molto sentimento—bears the character of a nocturne. It is built upon a chorale-like theme, fully presented at the outset and subsequently varied throughout the movement, interwoven with other melodic elements that at times take precedence, shifting the expressive tone into realms of tender sweetness.

At moments, the affect seems akin to that of the second movement of Schubert’s Unfinished Symphony (in the same key of E major), while at others the sidereal brightness appears to dim, and night (to continue the imagery) fleetingly reveals a darker, more mysterious or even ominous dimension. Yet the mystical impression ultimately prevails.

In contrast, the Allegretto—with its jolting theme in the minor mode—returns in its first two sections to the spirit of the opening movement. Some have considered it a precursor to Chopin’s mazurka. In the Trio, the Russian theme is quickly introduced in the major key: the very same melody that Mussorgsky would incorporate sixty years later in Boris Godunov as a symbol of popular jubilation (the people’s chorus during the coronation scene), and which Rimsky-Korsakov would also later use in The Tsar’s Bride.

Presented in fugal style and animated by a nimble accompanying figuration that enhances its festive character, the theme is passed from one instrument to another in dynamic alternation, swelling with crescendo and receding into a soft, melancholic decline that prepares the return to the first two sections.

The Finale plays with spirit upon the resources of refrains, couplets, and reprises, in a rhythmic and instrumental figuration that would later shape the distinct profile of the corresponding movement in the String Quartet in C-sharp minor, Op. 131. There is nothing tragic or passionate here; rather, it seems an immaterial transposition, into the string quartet medium, of a march of fifes and drums, again evoking picturesque and folk-like imagery.

Schering links this quartet to Jean Paul’s Flegeljahre (The Awkward Age), proposing the following parallels:

  • First movement: Chapter 62 – Portrait of the passionate Vult, burning with jealousy

  • Second movement: Portrait of the dreamer Walt, his brother (in connection with the narrative of his musical experiences, in Chapter 250)

  • Third movement: Chapter 63 – Masked ball scene; the dance of Wina and Walt

  • Fourth movement: Continuation of the masked ball; Wina’s dance with Vult, and their ardent declaration of love

Opus 59 Quartet No. 3 in C major for two violins, viola and cello

I) Introduction/Andante con moto – Allegro vivace – II) Andante con moto quasi allegretto – III) Menuetto – Grazioso – IV) Allegretto molto

A defining characteristic of this Quartet—excluding, however, the second movement due to its distinct expressive nature—is the affirmation of strength and willpower, entirely devoid of lyrical sentiment. This may well have earned it the perhaps hyperbolic nickname “Heroic Quartet.” A comparison might be drawn with Mozart’s Symphony in C major, also somewhat rhetorically dubbed Jupiter.

The introduction (Andante con moto), with its slow, dissonant chordal motion, establishes a dark atmosphere that lingers into the hesitant phrasing of the first theme of the Allegro vivace, entrusted to the solo violin. This hesitancy is then resolved with clarity in the second phrase, a forte statement by all four instruments, which, in the transition to and development of the second theme, adopts a more warmly open character.

Yet, the movement’s individuality is shaped less by the totality of its melodic-linear material than by the two-note motif that opens the first theme—a figure that in fact serves as the basis for the entire movement, including the second theme and all subsidiary elements. It poses a kind of interrogative or doubtful proposition that governs and sustains the musical discourse, coloring various expressive moments, forming the core of the development section (especially in the transitional episode leading to the recapitulation), and initiating the conclusion.

The Andante con moto, as previously noted, differs markedly in character from the other movements. A 1808 sketch (thus postdating the Quartet) for Collin’s Macbeth (Witches’ Chorus) bears some resemblance to the principal theme. The various musical elements that comprise the movement are linked by a certain affinity in melodic contour and rhythmic shape. Even what could be considered a second theme, in C major, never fully escapes the aura of nostalgic sadness that pervades the entire movement—imbued with a color that could once again be described as exotic, in the same sense previously noted when discussing a key characteristic of the Op. 59 quartets. Only occasionally does a pale ray of sunlight break through.

Beethoven’s recurring returns to the Minuet form, after so many freer and more agile Scherzi, often raise questions of aesthetic judgment. One might think of the Minuet of the Eighth Symphony or the Tempo di Minuetto that opens the Piano Sonata Op. 54. The present movement can plausibly be regarded as a reaction to the overly intense Romanticism of the preceding era. Thus, too, the Trio, whose opening evokes the effect of an entrance by wind instruments (woodwinds and horns), carries an almost rustic boldness.

A Coda restates the theme from the first section as a transitional element leading into the Finale (Allegro), which enters after a suspended cadence, in the form of a fugue. This fugue, freely treated, unfolds with a resolute drive that matches the overall spirit of the Quartet.

In the margins of a sketch, Beethoven wrote: “Just as today you throw yourself into the whirl of society, so too is it possible to write works in spite of all social obstacles. Let your deafness no longer be a secret, not even to Art.”

Schering associates this Quartet with Don Quixote:

  • Introduction, Book I, Ch. 1: Don Quixote meditates on books of chivalry

  • First Movement, Book I, Ch. 2: Departure on horseback from La Mancha; joyful anticipation of heroic deeds, concern over not yet being knighted; Don Quixote’s soliloquies until sunset

  • Second Movement, Book II, Ch. 3: Antonio’s Romance: “I know you love me, Olalla”

  • Third Movement, Book IV, Ch. 2: Gallant scene between the maiden Dorotea and Don Quixote; his chivalrous promise (in the Coda: the knight’s departure)

  • Fourth Movement, Book I, Ch. 8 and Book II, Ch. 1: Don Quixote rides into battle; fight against the windmills; battle with the Biscayan; victory and pride of Don Quixote