Opus 60 Symphony No. 4 in B flat major

I) Allegro vivace e con brio – II) Allegretto scherzando – III) Minuet tempo – IV) Allegro vivace

Opus 60 Symphony No. 4 in B-flat major, Op. 60, dedicated to Count Franz Oppersdorf, second half of 1806, published in orchestral parts in Vienna by Bureau d’arts et d’industrie, 1808; in full score in Bonn, Simrock, 1823. GA No. 4 (series 1/4) – B. 60 – KH. 60 – L. III, p. 49 – No. 60 – T. 129.

Orchestra: 1 flute, 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 2 horns, 2 trumpets, timpani, strings. The original manuscript is held at the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. Due to the absence of sketches, some have suggested that this symphony was composed quickly, in a single burst; however, this hypothesis is at least questionable and contradicts Beethoven’s usual compositional method, as he worked on his pieces for extended periods, making modifications and refinements until the very end. It is more plausible to admit that the symphony was composed over a shorter but more continuous period than his other works.

Count Franz von Oppersdorf, a Berliner, lived in a castle near Ober Glogau in Upper Silesia and maintained his own orchestra there.

He was connected by family ties and acquaintance with many families of the Austrian nobility; among them was that of Prince Lichnowsky, whose castle was a day’s journey from his own. It was during a visit by Lichnowsky, accompanied by Beethoven, in the autumn of 1806—when the Second Symphony was performed—that the noble proprietor had the idea to commission the maestro to compose another work of the same kind.

Beethoven, who was already working on two symphonies, in C minor and F major, intended to rival the previous Third (the Eroica), initially thought of dedicating the C minor symphony to Oppersdorf. However, he soon changed his mind: he temporarily set aside these two works (which would later become the Fifth and the Pastorale) and set about composing an entirely new symphony.

Thus was born the present Fourth Symphony in B-flat major, which was first performed at a concert at Prince Lobkowitz’s in March 1807, alongside two other major premieres: the Coriolan Overture and the Fourth Piano Concerto with orchestra. Its first public performance took place in December 1808 at the Theatre an der Wien. One theory, although purely conjectural, attributes the particular character of this work to the state of relative wellbeing and serenity Beethoven experienced through his love for Therese Brunsvik—a romantic episode for which, however, there is no firm documentary evidence. What is certain is that the Fourth, compared to the Third and Fifth (Schumann likened it to “a slender Greek maiden among two Nordic giants”), appears simpler in line and sustained by less grandiose ideas; as if the artist wished to sculpt from the sonic material a particular feeling of sweetness and delicacy.

The contrast between the gravity of the introduction (Adagio) and the lively spirit of the first movement (Allegro vivace) is not without Haydnian and Mozartian formal precedents. Haydn’s Symphony No. 102, also in B-flat major, is a particularly apt example. Yet Beethoven’s Adagio is darker and more profound, and the Allegro more spiritual; although the two movements share the same basic instrumental figure—staccato notes, which in the former evoke a mysterious anticipation, in the latter a lightness.

The Allegro is described as spiritual to characterise, in some way, its “lack of weight” in a dramatic and passionate sense, and also for a certain episodic gentle melodiousness peculiar to it; but that is not all, especially when one considers the variety of musical aspects (not conflicting but mutually complementary within a lively, poetic and spirited framework, which even contains touches of humour) that emerge from the principal theme during the development section.

Novelty and finesse of symphonic character are especially revealed in the transitional episode leading to the recapitulation; here, amid the thematic pulse, reduced to an elementary kernel of motion, the insistent timpani roll gradually clarifies as the fundamental note of the key, while the repeated surges of the violins ultimately restore the theme in its full form and orchestral sonority.

In the Adagio (the only movement of the four in which the playful or burlesque element does not appear), Beethoven’s art blends into a single, unified meaning the clear melody, the ornamentation, and the ostinato rhythm (of which we have already seen, and will see again, other episodic forms—for example in the first movement of the Third Piano Concerto op. 37 and in the second movement of the Second Quartet of op. 59) that runs through it from beginning to end with varying functions: sometimes as simple accompaniment, sometimes as expressive complement; sometimes contrasting, sometimes yielding to the melody, sometimes almost propelling it, like the beat of a heart in which the emotional pulse resonates physiologically.

Unusual in the first two sections of the third movement is the structure of the theme: an entrance in duple rhythm embedded within the 3/4 time signature alternates with an enveloping legato figuration, more or less developed, which clearly defines the rhythm within the 3/4 measure, reaffirming it also at the end in the emphatic cadence phrase. In the Trio, the pastoral-type cantilena of the wind instruments is followed by a sharp phrase from the violins, which seems almost to comment on it ironically. The murmur of the strings that accompanies the cantilena in its repetition also has a whimsical character. At the end of the reprise of the first two parts, a four-measure horn cadenza—considered by Schumann as a burlesque harmonic and instrumental figure—repeats the rhythm and tone.

Regarding the finale (Allegro non troppo), many commentators echo Berlioz’s brief judgment: “chatter of notes, interrupted by some hoarse and wild accents,” “angry outbursts.” Terms such as “perpetual motion,” “study figure,” and the like are also frequently used. But this is too little, as is the mere comparison to the finales of the First and Second Symphonies, where the spirit is different and simpler. The driving theme with which the movement begins animates and characterises it thoroughly, although it is sometimes interrupted by brief melodic episodes, which are soon carried away in its rapid course.

The instrumentation is fluid and light, despite some stubborn passing insistence on rhythms and harmonies; and the brief solos of the bassoon and later the clarinet, which restart the theme, also contribute to increasing its spirit. In an article published in the Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft in February 1943, Schering called this symphony “Schillerian” for the first three movements, illustrating their correspondence respectively with the following poems: First movement: Die Erwartung (Expectation) — Second movement: Sehnsucht (Longing) — Third movement: Die Gunst des Augenblicks (The Favour of the Moment) — “The Fourth movement might then be called: ‘Stroll by the brook,’ but here the brook is understood differently than in the Pastoral Symphony, as a lively, silvery, persistent companion that loses itself in whirlpools and rocky gorges, and to whose multifaceted aspects Beethoven associates, time after time, his joy as a walker.”

 [By Biamonti Giovanni – Catalogo cronologico e tematico delle opere di Beethoven comprese quelle inedite e gli abbozzi non utilizzati, Torino, ILTE 1968]

Official title: Opus 60 Symphonie Nr. 4 (B-dur) Widmung: Franz Joachim Reichsgraf von Oppersdorff NGA 1/2 AGA 4 = Serie 1/4

Origin and Publication: The autograph score is dated “1806.” Since only sketches for the initial ideas of the finale, written in 1804, have survived, it is impossible to date more precisely the main phase of the work. It may have been conceived between August and October 1806. The Prince Lobkowitz probably received a manuscript in November 1806. The original edition in parts was published in 1808/09 by the Kunst- und Industrie-Comptoir in Vienna and Pest. Between October 1805 and around July 1807 there is a gap in the sketchbooks, which was probably filled by at least one or two sketchbooks that are no longer extant today. These likely contained, among other things, sketches for op. 58, 60, and 62. The completion of the autograph score can be pinpointed more accurately based on Beethoven’s correspondence with Breitkopf & Härtel. On 5 July 1806 Beethoven reported having given his brother Kaspar Karl some handwritten works for a planned trip to Leipzig. The 4th Symphony was not among these (BGA 254). On 3 September Beethoven offered it to the publisher for the first time (BGA 256). Knowing Beethoven, of course, does not mean it was finished at that moment.

In mid-November 1806 he noted that the symphony was not yet ready: “die versprochene Symphonies kann ich ihnen noch nicht geben, weil ein vornehmer Herr sie von mir genommen, wo ich aber die Freyheit habe, sie in einem halben Jahr heraus zu geben f[…] vielleicht ist es möglich, daß ich die Symphonies vielleicht darf früher stechen lassen als ich hoffen durfte bisher, und dann können sie solche bald haben” (BGA 260). Consequently, the completion of work on op. 60 probably concluded in autumn 1806. According to current knowledge, the recipient of the manuscript mentioned in the letter was probably Prince Lobkowitz, with whom the first performance of the work took place in March 1807. The first fair copy transcription of the symphony was probably made for him.

Offers to Breitkopf & Härtel (3 September 1806, BGA 256f, 260f), Simrock in Bonn (April 1807, BGA 276–278), and Pleyel in Paris were unsuccessful regarding op. 60; as was Muzio Clementi in England. After Simrock did not respond to Beethoven’s request for payment at the end of May 1807 (BGA 282), the composer apparently reached an agreement in June 1807 with the Wiener Kunst- und Industrie-Comptoir for the publication of ops. 58–62. A report from Vienna (Journal des Luxus und der Moden, January 1808, p. 29), probably dating from late August/early September 1807, states that “die 4te Symphonie von ihm im Stiche” (the 4th Symphony was in engraving), as well as ops. 59, 61, and 62.

Dedication: Franz Joachim Wenzel, Imperial Count von Oppersdorff, born 29 September 1778 in Kopetzen, died 21 January 1818 in Berlin, son of Imperial Count Franz Philipp Oppersdorff and his wife Anna Maria, née Baroness Schirndinger von Schirnding. Majoratsherr of Ober-Glogau (Upper Silesia; Glogówek, Poland). Passionate about music, he maintained his own orchestra at his castle. From August to late October 1806, Beethoven was a guest of Prince Lichnowsky at the castle of Grätz near Troppau. Presumably during this stay he also made one or more visits to the castle of Ober-Glogau near Oppersdorff. The promise of a dedication for the symphony probably arose in those circumstances. After Beethoven had ceded the exclusive performance rights of the 4th Symphony to Prince Lobkowitz, he promised the Count the 5th Symphony. In March 1808, the composer confirmed in a letter that the symphony had been ready for some time (BGA 325).

However, on 1 November 1808 he apologised: “Sie werden mich in einem falschen Lichte betrachten, aber Noth zwang mich die Symphonies, die für sie geschrieben [Op. 67], und noch eine Andere dazu [Op. 68] an Jemanden ändern zu veraüßern — seyn sie aber versichert, daß sie die jenige, welche für sie bestimmt ist [Op. 60], bald erhalten werden —” (BGA 340). Although Oppersdorff repeatedly transferred money to Beethoven between February 1807 and March 1808, it is not documented whether he ever received a copy of the promised 4th or 5th Symphony. No further contact between Beethoven and Oppersdorff is known after November 1808.

First Performance: Probably in March 1807 (after 27 February 1807) in Vienna at one of the two private concerts held at Prince Lobkowitz’s palace, reserved exclusively for Beethoven’s works.

The sketches will be featured in an article specially created for the Beethovenian Music Research Center, www.lvbeethoven.org