Opus 68 – Symphony no. 6 in F major
I) Allegro ma non troppo – II) Andante molto mosso – III) Allegro – IV) Allegro – V) Allegretto
Opus 68 Symphony No. 6 in F major op. 68 (Pastoral), dedicated to Prince Franz Joseph Lobkowitz and Count Andreas Rasumowsky, 1807 – June 1808, published in separate parts in Leipzig, Breitkopf and Härtel, May 1809, in score ibid., May 1826.bGA. n. 6 (series 1/6) – B. 68 – KH. 68 – L. III, p. 95 – N. 68 – T. 141 Orchestra: 2 flutes, piccolo (in the fourth movement), 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 2 horns, 2 trumpets, 2 trombones (in the fourth and fifth movement), timpani, strings
The original manuscript is preserved in the Beethovenhaus. For the sketches, see the note to No. 447. Beethoven began working on this Symphony in the summer of 1807. Some sketches (the rustic dance of the third movement, the murmuring brook of the second) date back several years earlier.
The first performance took place on 22 December 1808 at the Theater an der Wien. In the concert programme, as reported by the Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung on 25 January 1809, the work was presented as follows:
Pastoral Symphony, more the expression of feeling than painting.
1st piece: Pleasant feelings which awaken in man upon arriving in the countryside.
2nd piece: Scene by the brook.
3rd piece: Joyful gathering of country folk.
4th piece: Thunder and storm.
5th piece: Beneficent feelings, linked with gratitude to the deity, after the storm.
In the score published in the GA, these titles are given as follows:
Awakening of cheerful feelings upon arrival in the countryside. Scene by the brook. Merry gathering of country people. Thunderstorm. Shepherd’s song. Cheerful and thankful feelings after the storm.
Among the various annotations interspersed with the sketches, the following are especially noteworthy (N., II, p. 375; D. W., p. 5):
The listener is left to discover the situations for themselves.
Characteristic Symphony = or Remembrance of country life.
Descriptive or programmatic music, understood in its broadest sense, has always offered mediocre musicians an easy means of exploitation. Particularly close to Beethoven in terms of both period and subject—and perhaps not unknown to him—is a modest Musical Portrait of Nature by the Swabian composer J. H. Knecht, published around 1784. However, by declaring that he intended to express feelings rather than engage in tone-painting, Beethoven likely meant to emphasise that—unlike most of his predecessors, and despite the formal similarities reinforced by the very use of subtitles—the substance of his composition was rooted in inner experience: in other words, true music, and not curiosity, jest, artifice, or mere depiction.
The countryside was, for Beethoven’s complex and tempestuous soul, a constant source of serenity. Anecdotes, fragments of diaries and letters, testimonies from friends—all reveal this throughout the pages of the great book of his life, from which there is no need here to quote well-known passages. How such a sentiment was translated into music, using musical “pastoral” elements that were reimagined and relived by a uniquely gifted mind and imagination—transforming traditional material into a refined and personal poem—has already been discussed elsewhere.
One should also not forget the influence that the work of the Enlightenment thinker Christian Sturm may have had on Beethoven’s feeling for nature at the time: Betrachtungen über die Werke Gottes im Reiche der Natur und der Vorsehung (Reflections on the Works of God in the Realm of Nature and Providence).
The principal theme of the Allegro ma non troppo—which some believe to be derived from a Slavic folk song—is gentle and peaceful; the second theme has the character of a simple rustic tune. Around these two, the entire movement unfolds: a musical depiction of the feelings one experiences upon arriving in the countryside, full of a charm that emerges from purely musical means—through melody and instrumental development alike, where even the secondary and derived elements contribute, with transparent analogies of form and idea.
The Andante con moto has an idyllic character, permeated by a subtle sense of dreamy melancholy. The only materially imitative elements appear towards the end, in the birdcalls of the nightingale, quail, and cuckoo—combined into a kind of little cadence in the tonic key. Is this a questionable joke in terms of taste, or perhaps a caricatured allusion to some overly contrived “predecessor”?
Even the annotation Beethoven added in a sketch referring to the basic figure in the violas and cellos, suggestive of the murmuring brook—“the larger the brook becomes, the lower the sound”—indicates the external origin of an image that was ultimately elevated to the level of purely musical inwardness.
The Merry gathering of country folk, with its themes and gestures drawn from gentle or rustic peasant dances, leads with increasing intensity to the almost frenzied outburst of the Allegro in 2/4 time. This serves as a necessary preparation for the Storm, which would not achieve its full dramatic power were it not for the preceding contrast, nor would it so naturally flow into the Hymn of Thanksgiving that follows.
To the exuberance of unrestrained and spontaneous joy, nature suddenly responds with the terrifying spectacle of its upheaval. All feelings of trust and love fall away from the naive human soul. Outbursts, pleas, pauses filled with dread, tragic cries. Gradually the fury subsides; a quiet voice rises and falls in the lower registers, like the onset of peace, reaffirming the original key of F major. And while distant, muffled rumblings are still faintly heard, and ghostly flashes briefly flicker, a sweet melody arches gently into a cantilena.
This is the same figure from the initial stormy movement, now expanded and transformed into something entirely different; it also resembles a famous chorale from Bach’s St Matthew Passion (itself apparently derived from the music of an old love song). A bagpipe makes its presence felt, while the heavy double pedal accompanying it (which so scandalised the 19th-century critic Ulibicheff for its “monstrous coupling of the keys of C and F”) still resonates with a quality of primordial nature.
Then begins the lilting melody of the Pastoral Hymn of Thanksgiving, which gradually grows richer with each repetition, through added instrumental parts and changing timbres. Its rhythm dominates amid the varied figures of the symphonic development, and remains unchanged in the second theme (which, like the first, is said to have Slavic folk origins, according to the aforementioned collection by Kuhac).
As the movement continues, a varied form gently unfolds over the undulating rhythm, while the original motif returns more than once to reassert itself. Deep, solemn harmonies, made even more so by the fuller use of wind instruments (woodwinds, horns, trumpets, trombones), lend the conclusion a distinctly choral, sacred character. Yet the presence of the pastoral element remains ever perceptible, as an expression of a primordial sense of peace and faith.
[By Biamonti Giovanni – Catalogo cronologico e tematico delle opere di Beethoven comprese quelle inedite e gli abbozzi non utilizzati, Torino, ILTE 1968]
Official title: Opus 68 Symphonie Nr. 6 (F-dur) Pastoral-Symphonie oder Erinnerung an das Landleben. Mehr Ausdruck der Empfindung als Malerei Widmung: Franz Joseph Maximilian Fürst Lobkowitz und Andreas Kyrillowitsch Graf Rasumowsky NGA1/3 AGA 6 = Serie 1/6
Creation and Publication: The symphony was sketched beginning in the summer of 1807, with individual ideas and fragments dating from earlier years (1803/04). The actual composition work began between early 1808 and September 1808. The original orchestral parts were published by Breitkopf & Härtel in Leipzig in May 1809, and the full score followed in May 1826.
Preliminary sketches for Op. 68 appear on a bifolio of the sketchbook Landsberg 12. These drafts were written during the summer of 1807, while Beethoven was composing the Mass in C major, Op. 86, which was performed on 13 September 1807 in Eisenstadt. Beethoven paused work on Op. 68 in favour of the Fifth Symphony, Op. 67, and other projects, resuming it around March 1808 and completing the symphony by August/September of that year.
Prince Lobkowitz, who had presumably acquired an exclusive six-month right to the symphony, had access to the performance material for private presentations before the public premiere. This is implied in Beethoven’s correspondence with Breitkopf & Härtel dated 8 June 1808, which mentions a six-month delay starting that month (BGA 327). Also likely related is a receipt from copyist Joseph Klumpar, approved by Lobkowitz at Eisenberg Castle on 17 October 1808: “Von einer Symphonies in F 160 Bögen zu 12xr macht – 32 f.”
In addition to the orchestral parts and score prepared for Breitkopf & Härtel, Klumpar copied a second score, likely needed for the Akademie on 22 December 1808. For editorial negotiations, the numbering of the Fifth and Sixth Symphonies, and the announcement of the original edition, see Op. 67.
The authentic metronome markings found in the incipits are taken from a booklet published by Steiner in 1817: “Bestimmung des musikalischen Zeitmasses nach Mälzel’s Metronom. Erste Lieferung. Beethoven. Symphonien Nr. 1–8 und Septett von dem Autor selbst bezeichnet.”
Title: On 28 March 1809, Beethoven informed Breitkopf & Härtel of the title of the symphony:
“Pastoral-Symphonies oder Erinnerung an das Landleben, Mehr Ausdruck der Empfindung als Mahlerey” (BGA 370).
The publisher had this subtitle printed on the back of the title page of the first edition, along with slightly shortened titles for each movement. This was likely because the French title “Symphonies Pastorale” had already been engraved by the time the letter arrived, and the commercial appeal of the edition was not thought to be harmed by lacking a fully German title.
According to a statement in the Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung, the German title “Pastoral-Symphonies” also appeared on the concert programme sheet for the Akademie, where Op. 68 was first performed.
Dedication: For information on the two dedicatees, see Opus 18 (Lobkowitz) and Opus 59 (Razumovsky). Beethoven specified them in a letter dated 4 March 1809:
“Both symphonies are dedicated to both gentlemen, namely: His Excellency Count Rasoumowsky and His Serene Highness Prince Lobkowitz – Symphony in C minor Op. 60 [sic], Symphony in F Op. 61 [sic]” (BGA 359).
The first public performance took place at Beethoven’s Akademie on 22 December 1808 at the Theater an der Wien.
This concert also featured the public premieres of the Choral Fantasy, Op. 80, the Fourth Piano Concerto, Op. 58 (with Beethoven himself as soloist), the Fifth Symphony, Op. 67, the Gloria and Sanctus from the Mass in C major, Op. 86, and an improvised solo Free Fantasy by the composer.
The Annalen der Literatur und Kunst wrote: „Die erste [der beiden aufgeführten Symphonien] ist im Pastoral Geschmack geschrieben und schildert in viererley Absätzen die Vergnügungen des Landlebens. Die Szene am Bach ist ein liebliches, rein empfundenes Ganzes, voll neuer überraschender Harmonien, die sich in verschiedenen Krümmungen, des Thema nie verblassend, oft in den grellsten, oft in den klarsten Abweichungen miteinander verschlingen. Der darauffolgende Sturm ist wirklich genialich, und im höchsten Grade pitoresk. Ein treues Gemählde der schauerlichen Natur, groß und neu in allen seinen Theilen. Schwerlich dürfte in dieser Art, sowohl von Seite der Erfindung, als des höchst sonderbaren, pikanten Gebrauches der Instrumente etwas iffectvolleres und wahreres aufgefunden werden. Welch ein Wogen, Stürmen, Fallen und Steigen der grellsten, bizarrsten Modulazionen! Ein Aufstemmen der Kraft gegen den unbezwingbaren Rythmus, ein Eingreifen in feuersprühende Tonmassen, die oft zu künstlich verwogen, nur darum die Täuschung stören, um neue Täuschungen durch neue Ueberraschungen hervorzuzaubern”
The sketches will be featured in an article specially created for the Beethovenian Music Research Center, www.lvbeethoven.org








