The videos and documents of the trip and the concert in Bonn, 24–27 April 2014

This page gathers the videos related to the concert.
The first clip is the complete speech by Luigi Bellofatto, translated by Federica Rovelli (translation not included here).
Thank you, Luigi, for mentioning me and for giving me the pleasure — and the honour — of citing our website www.lvbeethoven.org..

The second video refers to the introduction given by Michael Ladenburger, director of the museum section of the Beethoven-Haus.
Ladenburger introduces Luigi and his studies and writings on Beethoven and on A.W. Thayer, which led to the 2010 exhibition at the Beethoven-Haus; he also thanks me for the work done on Beethoven’s watch, as well as for having found a period key to replace the one lost (or stolen) after the arson attack the museum suffered years ago.

The remaining videos concern the concert: a short introduction, then the Fantasy Biamonti 213, the two Rondos WoO 49 and 48, the Dressler Variations WoO 63, and finally — added in July 2015 — a fragment of the Bagatelle WoO 59, the very famous “Für Elise”.
Enjoy listening; for many of you the Fantasy will be a very rare experience.
Unique in its performance on the Graf piano preserved at the Beethoven-Haus in Bonn.

Beethoven’s Watches: Supplementary Research

Beethoven and the Art of Horology – The Watches of Beethoven – Part 2

Published in Neue Beethoven Studien Vol 11 (2014) – Luigi Bellofatto (Bovisio Masciago) – Armando Orlandi (San Biagio di Valpolcevera – Genova) Beethoven and the Art of Horology. The watches of Beethoven, Tobias Haslinger and Alexander W. Thayer Part 2: Addenda and Corrigenda.

A. Pocket watch Rost

Two events occurred after the publication of the first part of this article that suggested to the authors (1) that they augment the description of the pocket watch marked Rost 1797 shown in the photographic collection of the Beethoven-Haus (sign. 738/ a-b-c. and Ley, Band VI, no. 1141).

The first of these events was the recent auction sale that took place in Potsdam on April 16, 2011,(2) where this watch was sold. This sale allowed the authors to watch a high-definition video,(3) as well as view a series of photographs that proved decisive for the description of this item.The second event was Armando Orlandi’s purchase of a pocket watch by the same Maison (maker) and with the same mechanism as the one supposedly owned by Beethoven.

It was purchased in June of 2011 from an antiquarian watch-dealer in Sofia. If we analyze the series of photographs of the auction catalogue in Potsdam, they show very interesting details (that of course could not have been included in the first part of the article) especially as regards the movement. These details were not shown in the photographs belonging to the Beethoven-Haus, dating to about 90 years ago, nor in the ones in the Ley collection.

In Fischhoff’s copy of the Verzeichnis des Beethovenschen Nachlasses found in the estate of Otto Jahn and then passed to A.W. Thayer, it states that: (1)

Die Auction fand statt 5. Nov. 1827 am Kohlmarkt No. 1149 hintere Stiege 2. Stock, unter Leitung des Schatzmeisters Anton Grafer Gesammtertrag 1140 f. 18 C.M. Gerichtliche (oder Berichtliche?) Inventur und Schatzung iiber das Verlassen-schafts Vermogen des den 26. Marz 1827 mit Testament verstorbenen Herrn Ludwig van Beethoven, Tonsetzer No. 200 in der Alservorsadt, seel, durch 8 Tage.

In the paragraph “An Praziosen”, is the following entry: 1 silberne Minutenuhr 8 f. This statement shows that Beethoven had at least one silver (pocket) watch but following long and extensive research on the subject, interesting results have emerged regarding other watches and clocks that Beethoven owned during his lifetime.(2)

The first instance in which a pocket watch owned by Beethoven is mentioned and described in any publication, appears in the issue of The Musical Times dated 15 December 1892 (p. 17), in an article devoted to Beethoven memorabilia: BEETHOVEN’S WATCH. This watch, now in the possession of G. W. Davy, Esq., is supposed to be the one which is known to have been sent by Moscheles from London. The case is of silver and of foreign manufacture, while the works are of English make. The maker, George Prior, was also a well-known violoncellist, and it is not too much to suppose that he was known to Moscheles. Another reason for favouring this supposition is that in the filigree covering of the interior works is the figure of a lyre.

The maker, George Prior, was working in Prescot Street, London between 1765 andl810. There is also a picture of the watch (plate 1). Recent research has discovered that this watch is now part of the Applied Arts Collection in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (U.K.) (3) It was donated to the Museum by Ralph Griffin, MA on 14 December 1929.(4) The case is of Continental design, and was made especially for this movement. The movement is small for the case. There is a plain silver disc to close the case opening and support the movement, and a decorated band of silver fitted under the dial. These details suggest that the case was made to fit an existing movement.

These stones, placed on the movement for ornamental purposes only, are only two in the Sofia example. The stones seem entirely natural: the first experiments with synthetic stones were only in 1837, ten years after the death of Beethoven, and the commercialization of the first synthetic rubies did not occur until the early 20th century. In the Potsdam watch the deletion of the cocks has to led the elimination of the regulating unit of the spiral made in an alloy that looks like aluminum, mounted in all of the watches of that time.

This missing component may also be attributed to a clumsy attempt to repair the watch, which occurred a long time ago; the photographs of the 1920s already show the loss of this part of the mechanism. As a consequence it is not possible to adjust the time accurately. The watch maker should have adjusted the motion by shortening or lengthening the coil directly on the regulation split pin and changing, of course, the isochronisms of the movement. This practice is rather unconventional, but acceptable as a “ultima ratio” in the horology.

The sequence of the double horns in the Empire style, finely engraved with a burin, is identical in the two watches. Another interesting point in the Potsdam watch is the dial. In the position of the mounting feet it is possible to see the typical failure due to fall or manipulation; in fact, the breaking of a hand could argue for this hypothesis (and of course the replacement of the glass).

However, after a deep review and check of the Sofia watch, it is possible to make an interesting deduction: the dial of clock in Sofia is of original finish, with three feet welded originally at the right point. It is magnificent silvered piece, with two mercury-gilded hands(7) that could easily be confused with the background, especially if its owner were afflicted with myopia. By the way, it is known that Beethoven was short-sighted, as confirmed by many biographers and by the glasses owned by Beet-hoven-Haus (R 6a and R 7b). Then it was a common practice to replace the original dial with another more visible one as in the Sofia; this could be happened in the Sofia watch as the enamel of the dial is slightly damaged.

The same maker manufactured the two external cases, a red one in the Potsdam, and a green one in the Sofia. Both have a long line of decorative silver tacks, a simple lock, and an internal velvet, where the color has disappeared after more than 215 years. It is worthy to note that the Potsdam watch appears much more intact and in better condition in the photographs from the 1920s than in the contemporary images of the auction. In particular, apart from the breaking of the hand, the bottom glass appears very damaged near the lock; this usually happens after several years of use.

This watch, which is believed to have been owned by Beethoven, was acquired by Gutsche in 1916 who did not know the identities of any of its owners since Beethoven. If it were indeed the watch owned by Beethoven, it may also be supposed, also due to the Hungarian emblem, that it is the one that Nicolaus Zmeskall (8) gave to Beethoven as gift. However, although it has not been possible to confirm the authenticity of the Potsdam watch as belonging to Beethoven, the authors can reliably authenticate the date 1797 for it.

B. Pocket watch Prior

A few words should be added regarding the other silver pocket watch supposed to have been owned by Beethoven (a present from Moscheles) and now at the Fitzwil-liam Museum in Cambridge (UK).(9) Two modern photos are available on the website of the Museum,(10) in addition to the one published in the previous article (plate 1) that was dated 1892. Although it was not possible to check the proper functionality,(11) the watch is in the same very good condition as shown in the old photo.

Here below some detailed dimensions:

height: (case): 72.75 mm; diameter: (case): 59.75 mm depth: (case): 21 mm diameter: (top plate): 38.75 mm diameter: (pillar plate): 41 mm diameter: (dial): 42.5 mm height: (pillar): 4.5 mm height: (key): 35 mm width: (key): 15 mm length: (case): 108 mm width: (case): 90 mm depth: (case): 28 mm

Among watch makers there are a few persons named George Prior:

George Prior, London, 1765-1810 George Prior, Leeds, worked 1817-1826

George Prior (the most famous and probably the maker of this pocket watch), Ness-field, son of John,12 born in 1782, was active in London at 31 Prescot Street, Goodman’s Fields, London after 1822 and worked between 1793 and 1830. He was a maker of repute, especially in watches for Turkey. He received two awards from the Society of Arts. Succeeded by his son Edward (1812-1868).

For the Fitzwilliam watch the only proof of Beethoven’s ownership is the name “L. van Beethoven’s/Taschenuhr” in gilt lettering on the white silk interior of the lid. This watch was in the possession of George Baynton Davy,(13) as reported in an article devoted to Beethoven memorabilia in The Musical Times dated 15 December 1892 (p. 17 and 24).

George Baynton Davy(14) (1838-1907) was from Nottinghamshire, England and moved to Kingussie (Scotland) after his marriage to Martha MacKay, the daughter of a lawyer from Fort William. Davy had inherited money from his father George Thomas Davy, who had worked in South America organising the extraction of guano (bird droppings). Part of the Davy’s musical collection included “Relics, Manuscripts and letters of Handel, Beethoven, Wagner, and other foreign Composers” which was sold at auction on 24 July 1916 by Sotheby, Wilkinson and Hodge.(15) The “Relics of Beethoven – The property of the late G.B. Davy, Esq.” sold at this auction include the Beethoven watch, the memorandum book (later described), a lock of Beethoven’s hair with inscription of the composer’s friend Dolezalek(16) and a letter to his brother Johann dated 13 July 1825.(17)

Among Davy’s musical collection it is worthy to mention three notable Beethoven manuscripts; the first piece is the last part (8 pages) of the Sonata for Piano (A flat major) op. 110,(18) later in Louis Koch’s(19) collection(20) and now at the Beethoven-Haus as part of the Bodmer collection.(21) The second Beethoven manuscript owned by Davy is the Scheide sketchbook(22) that was purchased at the 1827 auction of Beethoven’s estate by the music publisher and dealer Domenico Artaria,(23) whose son, August Artaria,(24) sold it to the collector Eugen von Miller(25) in 1871.

From von Miller, it passed on to Davy; Louis Koch of Frankfurt-am-Main then acquired it for his collections;26 his heirs incorporated it into the Floersheim collection,(27) from which William Scheide(28) procured it in 1965. It is now at Princeton University Library (USA). The third notable manuscript is the Memorandum book, also known as the “Jugendtagebuch”(29) that Beethoven wrote in the year 1792-1794 after that he had just arrived in Vienna. A facsimile of three pages(30 is reproduced in The Musical Times dated 15 December 1892 (p. 33); this is now at the British Library(31) as part of the Stefan Zweig(32) collection. Zweig purchased it at the auction of Sotheby & Co. on 4th of June 1929,(33) whose lot no. 400 reports: “Beethoven (Ludwig van) Manuscript Note-Book, 25 11.19 of which have rough notes in pen or pencil in Beethoven’s handwriting, about journeys, sums spent and other memoranda, original blue paper boards, front cover broken (155mm by 92 mm).

On folio 12 initials L.v.B. appear […] Facsimiles of 3 leaves of this book were given in the Special Beethoven Number of the Musical Times (15 Dec. 1892), a copy of which is included in the lot. Also included are letters from Eugen Miller(34) of Vienna and Mrs. Mackintosh(35), former owners of the note-book(36); and a photograph of Beethoven’s watch”.After Davy the Beethoven’s watch was owned by Ralph Griffin,(37) who, on 14 December 1929, donated it to the Fitzwilliam Museum. He owned autographs of the two great piano duet-sonatas by Mozart, and compositions in autograph by Bach, Schubert, Beethoven and Debussy. Griffin also presented music to the Bodleian Library and the British Museum and was a notable collector whose generosity enriched the Fitzwilliam Museum.

In 1922 Griffin gave to the Fitzwilliam Museum a leaf from the Hammerklavier sonata Op.106(38) in which “the main content is an ink sketch of an abandoned keyboard movement in Bb minor; this begins on staves 4/5 of the recto and continues on the verso. Apart from some pen trials on staves 1 and 2 and in the margins of the recto, and a sketch on stave 12 of the recto which is related to the main draft, all the other sketches – written in pencil rather than in ink – are for the slow movement of this sonata”.(39)

Griffin owned another important Beethoven autograph which contained the first two bars of the third movement of Piano Sonata op. 106,(40) the same two measures which he sent to Ries(41) to correct the English edition of the sonata. Beethoven must have given this autograph to the Viennese publishers of the sonata, Artaria, in December 1818 to amend the opening of the third movement (Adagio sostenuto). They were written in lead pencil on a small sheet of music paper, and since they were unaccompanied by a written explanation they were probably delivered in person. The sheet was formerly in the collection of the Beethoven biographer Alexander Wheelock Thayer (1817-1897)(42) and bears the endorsement “Given by Artaria to A.W.T. March 24, 1850” written in pencil on the bottom right on the page. Then, it was sold at a Sotheby’s auction on 18 February 1899(43) and so purchased by Griffin who presented this manuscript to Fitzwilliam Museum on 1915. It is remarkable to add that Griffin at the above-mentioned auction also purchased three Schubert manuscripts(44) and two letters by Beethoven(45) to Nikolaus Zmeskall that were given to the Fitzwilliam Museum in 1917.

C. Schwarzwalder Clock

Because of a comment in footnote 21 of the previous article46 the authors were contacted by Dr. Dagmar von Busch-Weise, formerly a longstanding researcher at the Beethoven Archives. She identified Plate 8 on page 18 as a photograph of the “Bonner Zimmer” at the Beethoven-Haus in Bonn, i.e. the room of the museum in which manuscripts, pictures, and personal items of Beethoven relating to his years spent in Bonn as well as pieces of furniture owned by his family were shown. The pendulum clock given by the composer to Stephan von Breuning(47) is displayed there. Gerhard von Breuning himself comments on this clock in his book where he reports:
“Aus jener Zeit stammt eine noch in meinem Besitze befindliche Schwarzwalder-Uhr, welche Beethoven damals meinem Vater schenkte”.(48) The clock is mentioned later in the catalogue(49) of the exhibition held in the Vienna Stadt-Museum in 1920 and again in the catalogue of the Centennial Exhibition in Vienna in 1927, under the chapter “Koje Hausrat Beethovens” as belonging to the grandson of Beethoven’s close friend, Stephan von Breuning:

H. Dr. Stefan Breuning, Wien.

Geschenk B.s an St. v. Breuning(50)

This clock is also listed in the book “Ein Wiener Beethoven-Buch: Studien und Skizzen,” edited in 1921 by Alfred Orel, in the chapter written by Wilhelm Englmann “Beethoven-Reliquien in Wien.” He describes it on p. 233 as “Eine einfache Schwarz-walderuhr, die Beethoven in einer fruheren Wohnung benutzt und dem Freunde Stephan geschenkt hatte”; on page 235 the same photo as plate 951 in the first part of this article is reproduced but described as: “Hausrat Beethovens in der Wiener Gedachtnisausstellung 1920” and “Hausrat Beethovens in der Beethoven-Ausstellung der Stadt Wien 1920-1921”.(52)

Beethoven gave this clock as a present to Stephan von Breuning. It was then acquired by the Haydn and Beethoven collector Antony van Hoboken.(53) His son, Ing. Anthony van Hoboken, confirmed that his father was in Vienna from 1925 to 1938-1939 so very probably he acquired it from Breuning just before July 1929 when the Breuning collection was dissolved. E.R. Fuchs wrote an article in 1929 on Breuning’s Beethoven memorabilia describing the treasures and saying that the collection “up to a few weeks before” had been in the possession of the family. He also advised that the clock was not seen by him because it had already been sold: Die ubrigen Gegenstande der aufgelosten Breuningschen Sammlung sind anders-wohin gewandert, und ich konnte sie nicht sehen. Es waren nur noch sehr wenige Stucke: einige Miniaturen, eine Uhr und mehrere Kleinigkeiten waren noch zu erwerben, dagegen waren ein paar sehr wertvolle Bilder und Portrate leider schon fruher verkauft worden.(54)

The clock has been in Hoboken’s house for long time, as his son remembers in a note to the authors: “a simple clock without the wooden case”. At that time during the Carnival Fest at the College Papio di Ascona, the priest Hugo Sander was searching for a grandfather clock to be fixed on the wall and he asked the most prominent Ascona people, including Mr. van Hoboken to supply one. Hoboken replied that he would have loaned a clock, but that it was necessary to have it repaired as it is not working properly. This clock is indeed the one in the Beethoven-Haus that Hoboken had purchased from Breuning some years before.

It was that after this event (around mid 1953) that this clock was given to the Beethoven Haus. An article of that time entitled “Da Ascona a Bonn – l’orologio di Beethoven”(55) reports this donation: Dopo che un bravo orologiaio ebbe eseguito con perizia le necessarie riparazioni l’orologio mostro’ d’essere tornato ‘regolarissimo’ sul palco del teatro Papio -il Sig. van Hoboken stimo’, nella sua generosita’, cosa opportuna di regalare il prezioso oggetto all’archivio Beethoveniano che si trova a Bonn, citta nata del piu grande compositore di tutti i tempi. Il prof. Schmidt-Gorg, direttore dell’archivio in parola, ha esternato a nome della citta’ di Bonn la sua commossa riconoscenza al signor van Hoboken. L’orologio si trova gia da qualche mese in una delle stanze della Beethoven-Haus.

Dr. von Busch-Weise said that the clock was kept running, and she recalls the sound of its stroke. This clock perished on 9 May 1960, when a visitor to the museum spilled a flammable liquid onto the wooden floor of the Bonner Zimmer and ignited it. Dr. von Busch-Weise was an eyewitness to the ensuing fire which destroyed the entire room with all its inventory. Fortunately the other rooms and treasures of the museum by and large could be saved by the fire brigade. This is largely due to the circumstance that one of the museum guides, out of experience gained in the bombing raids of World War II, quickly closed all doors to prevent the flames from spreading. Of the wooden clock’s case only charred relics remained, while a few metal parts of the clockwork were found by Dr. von Busch-Weise when she carefully sifted through the ashes and rubble that had been shoveled by the firemen out of the windows into the court.

An article from a local journal(56) reports a detailed description of the clock and the donation to the Beethoven Haus:

Das Beethovenhaus ist um einen kleinen kostbaren Schatz reicher geworden: Der Musikfreund und Haydn-Forscher Anthony van Hoboken aus Ascona in der Schweiz hat dem Beethovenhaus vor wenigen Tagen eine Wanduhr ubergeben, die Beethoven im Jahre 1811 seinem alten Freund Stephan von Breuning ge-schenkt hatte. Die Uhr ist eine Schwarzwalder Uhr der damaligen Zeit, die au-fier einem Glockenschlag auch noch einen Wecker hat. Ihr Werk, das Schlagwerk und der Wecker werden durch drei 2,40 Meter lange Kordeln in Gang gehalten, an deren Enden je ein schweres Gewicht und ein Gegengewicht hangen.

Kastellan Hasselbach hat des seltene Stuck inzwischen wieder in Gang ge-bracht. Sie zeigt nun wieder durch ihren Schlag, der durch das ganze Beethoven-haus tont, jede Stunde an und geht auf die Minute genau. Sie soll demnachst im Bonner Zimmer des Hauses der Offentlichkeit zuganglich gemacht werden. Ferner ist beabsichtigt in Zukunft durch Ihren Schlag den Beginn der interner mu-sikalischen Veranstaltungen im Beethovenhaus anzuzeigen.

Wie Professor Dr. J. Schmidt-Gorg, der Leiter des Beethovenarchivs und Direktor des Musikwissenschaftlichen Seminars der Universitat, in einem Gesprach mit der “Bonner Rundschau” versicherte, kann an der Echtheit der Uhr kein Zweifel bestehen, da ihr eine Echtheitsbescheinigung der Familie von Breuning beigegeben ist. Die Uhr war seit Ihrer Schenkung im Jahre 1811 im Besitz der Familie von Breuning, Dr. Gerhard von Breuning, ein Sohn Stephans von Breuning, dem Beethoven die Uhr geschenkt hatte, bezeugte die Schenkung Beethovens auch in der zweiten Auflage seines Buches “Aus dem Schwarzspanierhause”. In ihm bemerkt er zum Jahre 1811: “Aus jener Zeit stammt eine noch in meinem Besitz befindliche Schwarzwalder Uhr, welche Beethoven damals meinem Vater schenkte”.

Der Schweizer Musikfreund van Hoboken erwarb das Stuck vor einigen Jahren, als die Nachkommen der Familie von Breuning Erinnerungsstucke an Beethoven verkauften. Dafi diese Uhr nun nach Bonn komme, sei besonders erfreulich, weil Beethoven als junger Mensch vor allem nach dem Tode seiner Mutter im Hause von Breuning, das damals in Bonn am Munsterplatz stand, sehr viel verkehrte und dort eine zweite Heimat gefunden habe, sagte Professor Schmidt-Gorg. Spater seien einige Mitglieder der Familie von Breuning mit ihm nach Wien ubergesiedelt. Das alte von Breunische Haus hat bis etwa um die Jahrhun-dertwende dort gestanden, wo heute der Kaufhof ist. This article confirms again that the clock was given to Breuning by Beethoven in 1811 and that the ropes carrying the weights were 2,40 m. long.

Another article published at the end of the year 1955 discussed this clock recently acquired by the Beethoven Haus with the other “Standuhr”(57) already owned by the Beethoven Haus:

Uber die kleine Schreibtischuhr – eine Standuhr in Form einer umgekehrten Pyramide mit einem Frauenkopf aus Alabaster als Bekronung – ist nichts mehr bekannt, als dafi sie auf dem Schreibtisch des Genius gestanden hat. Von ihrer Herkunft weifi man so gut wie gar nichts. Die Wanduhr – zur Vorsicht hat man inzwischen einem Glaskasten nach Art einer modernen Standuhr um sie herum-gebaut – hat aber schon eine recht ansehnliche und durch Urkunden bezeugte Geschichte.(58)

Every morning Castellan Hasselbach would wind all the clocks present in the museum and as confirmed by an article of that time: “Die beiden Uhren stellen gleich-zeitig dem alten deutschen Uhrmacherhandwerk das schonste Zeugnis aus: Obwohl sie schon schatzungsweise an die 150 Jahre alt sind, gehen sie heute noch auf die Minute genau. Es gehort zu den taglichen Pflichten van Kastellan Hasselbach, beide Chronometer allmorgendlich aufzuziehen – die Schreibtischuhr mit einem kleinen Schlussel und die Wanduhr an ihren Seilzugen”.(59)

This clock is also mentioned in some brochures on the Beethoven-Haus that were published in the 1950s (and also later than 1960, after the fire) as part of the collection of the memorabilia in the Bonn-Room “The clock was a present of Beethoven to his friend Stephan von Breuning in 1811”.(60)

It is historically and technically necessary to give some more information about this type of clock, which bore the name of the mountainous and wooded region of the Black Forest (Schwarzwald).

One of the remarkable things in the history of the Black Forest clock(61) is that a group of farmers should have possessed the necessary ability for such work. The inhabitants were frugal and industrious but had no spirit of trade or industry until the wars of the seventeenth century brought them into closer contact with the outside world. The climatic conditions provided only a very short summer, and during the long winter the inhabitants had to stay indoors and carry on some activity other than farming. As timber was plentiful, most of them chose woodcarving, but the timber was mostly of the coniferous type and therefore soft, and the harder woods such as beech were less easy to come by. Another factor in the shaping of the economic life was the system of inheritance. A family farm was always inherited by the youngest son, and the older brothers and sisters had either to be dependent on their youngest brother or take up other work. Many of them chose woodcarving and eventually there were a large number of woodcarvers in the area who formed a pool of workers with manual dexterity. Production went on increasing throughout the eighteenth century and up to the end of the first half of the nineteenth. The accelerating tempo of the industrial revolution made it necessary for more workers to possess a clock so that they could arrive at their factory on time, and the cheap Black Forest product filled this need admirably. The capacity of an ordinary shop would be four clocks per week. The end of the eighteenth century was a prosperous time for the Black Forest clockmakers. Since the 1770’s, designs had not changed much and sales were increasing.

D. The Pendulum clock present at the Beethoven-Haus at the Entrance Hall

This clock is of course not related to Beethoven as a man but to his birthplace and it has been present at the Beethoven-Haus for many years.

This clock was located inside the hall of the museum against the wall near the stairs that were used for access directly to the first floor, without having to go out into the small courtyard garden. It has been photographed and shown in many guide of the Museum published since 1911.(62)

The English guide of the Museum from 1965 describing the Entrance Hall of the Beethoven-Haus writes: “On entering the large hall with its old-fashioned timbered ceiling and picturesque staircase one obtains the impression of a typical well-kept middle-class house of those days and hardly of an aristocratic one, like Goethe’s house-of-birth, for instance. One the right one’s glance falls upon an old clock and above the staircase on a picture of the Blessed Virgin Mary.”.(63)

Unfortunately this clock is not working anymore and has been completely disassembled. Only its wonderful wooden case survives at the third floor of the Museum, with other collection items.

A clock of this type is called a floor clock or a long case clock. Its history goes back to the year 1656 when a Dutchman named Christian Huygens (1629-1695) was the first person to use a pendulum, as a driving device, in clocks. This was the birth of the Grandfather clock, or to use the correct terminology, long case clock. The first long case clocks were produced in Britain, after the London clock maker Ahasuerus Fromenteel sent his son to Holland to learn about the use of a pendulum

For the first 15 years long case clock makers struggled to develop a pendulum device capable of keep accurate time. By 1670 an anchor escapement had been developed that, when used in conjunction with a pendulum, allowed great accuracy to be achieved. This development ensured that history would remember Britain as the dominant producer in the world of clock making. Names such as Joseph Knibb, Thomas Tompian, George Graham, and Daniel Quare all come to mind when discussing the history of long case clocks. The earliest cases were made from oak and were architectural in appearance. Higher quality clocks would be finished with ebony or pear wood. Later cases were made from high quality African mahogany. Today, beautiful examples of what is called “flame mahogany” can also be seen. Early dials were square and made of brass.

E. The repair by Armando Orlandi of the Beethoven’s Tischstanduhr64 preserved at the Beethoven-Haus

The repair of the Beethoven clock was long desired by Armando Orlandi and realized thanks to the collaboration and acceptance of Dr. Michael Ladenburger,(65) curator of the collections of the Beethoven-Haus in Bonn, whose special interest and kind willingness has made it possible.

This treasure is preserved in room 9 of the museum, called the Bodmer room. In fact inside this room, there are shown most of the objects that belonged by Beethoven which were part of the collection of the Swiss doctor Hans Conrad Bodmer that was bequeathed to the Beethoven-Haus by him in 1956. This is the only clock surely owned by Beethoven. It was given to him as a gift (66) from the Princess Christine Lichnowsky. (67) After the death of Beethoven it came into Anton Schindler’s possession, then it was owned Schindler’s sister Marie Egloff (68) and after that August Nowotny(69 in Altrohlau and Carl Meinert(70) in Dessau. Meinert sold the Beethoven items to the Beethoven-Haus in 1898.

The repair of this clock started at 9 a.m. on the 29 September 2011 in the reading room of the Library of the Beethoven-Haus. The clock was carefully taken by Dr. Ladenburger from the display cabinet in the museum and then placed on the table of the library. The rear pyramid shaped door is fixed by a small hook and a small nail with an L shape, very old, but not as old as the period of the clock (1810). On the interior part of this door it is possible to observe some tags written with old ink

(Unreadable- 18/01/66 Unreadable 9185-2-70 19-63K and 1019111), evidence of previous repairs. These tags were used by watchmakers as a record of when the watch or clock was repaired and as a warranty, and are not used today.

The movement is fixed to a bronze lunette by three clamping screws (not coeval), and probably replaced in the nineteenth century, as the thread is machine-made with a technique dating from after 1850. This movement is of rectangular shape, to be wound from the front.

After removing the bezel that holds the glass and the two hands of gilt bronze mercury held by a split pin, the movement was removed from the foul line, held by just four brass split pins probably from the same era. It was also possible to look at the internal grain, due to the processing of the enamel, with a beautiful inscription “III 3 / Z,” probably from the atelier of the enameller. An inscription “1810.” is written with Indian ink under the bronze bezel.

The internal side of the wooden case has been irregularly cut with a sort of gouge; the movement is held by two screws the last action was the removal of the spring from its housing. This spring looked very old, perhaps coeval, with traces of a very old repair with a lot of sludge from the natural lubricant oil, which over time became glue-like. The mechanical parts of this small clock were completely disassembled. Each of the brass gears, which were partially oxidized and covered with sludge, was cleaned with two special liquids. Finally, the old suspension wire (not contemporary) that was completely damaged and no longer useable, was replaced.

Then the two insertion holes (of oval shape due to the use) and plate, were tightened; this operation is absolutely necessary for the perfect alignment of the gears. In all, the repair took about three hours. Then the repaired mechanism was tested before being inserted into its case.

The style of this clock is late Empire, when neoclassicism became influenced by more freedom in the details. At that time, as it was common in Austria, many objects were re-interpreted by adapting the general taste in favor of a local one, making the style more eclectic. As last note, it is difficult to imagine the construction of the clock in a unique style. The small bust has been examined by a magnifying glass and could represent a Minerva, but, especially as it is believed to have been added in a later period, as a Cornelia or Santa Cecilia, or as an example of Roman “tout court virtus”.

In the afternoon the clock was returned by Dr. Ladenburger and Mr. Orlandi to its previous place, in the tall case with other smaller items from Beethoven’s everyday life.(71)

Notes

1
This refers to the previous article published by the authors; see L. Bellofatto / A. Orlandi, Beethoven and the Art of Horology, in: BBS 9 (2011), pp. 7-34. After this article, new discoveries and new information were found and some corrections were needed, so an addendum of the article was absolutely necessary. The authors are grateful to Laura McCann and James Green for reading the sketch of this article, editing it and making many useful suggestions.
2
The Auction was held by Auktionshaus Eichelkraut Inh. Tobias Kuhrober E.K, Potsdam (Germany). The catalogue lists the watch as the lot no. 259: “Kulturgeschichtliches Objekt – Alpenlandische Spindel-taschenuhr mit Schutzgehause aus dem Besitz Ludwig van Beethovens, 1770 Bonn – 1827 Wien; Gehause signiert: (Heinrich) Rost, (Hofuhrmacher) Salzburg; schlichtes, versilbertes Messinggehause mit einfa-cher Rand-Lunettenverzierung; der Ruckendeckel mit zeitgenossischer Gravur ,Ludwig van Beethoven‘; glattes, rot gelacktes / emailliertes Ubergehause mit graviertem Glasring und umlaufenden Zierstiften; bei der 12 gravierte Jahreszahl ‘1797’; uber die 12 hinausklappbares Uhrwerk; ovales, weifies Emaille-zifferblatt mit schwarzem, romischem Zahlenindex; Messing-Vollplatinenwerk, fein graviert mit reichem Volutendekor und Randverzierung sowie mit roten Schmucksteinen; runde, gegliederte und verzierte Stege / Pfeiler; fein ausgesagte, silberne Spindelbrucke in Form des Kossuth-Wappens; Messingunruh, Antrieb uber Feder, Kette und Schnecke, Spindelhemmung, Zeigerstellung und Schlusselaufzug von hinten; Werkdurchmesser 19 lh ” (ca. 42 mm); D (Uhr) = 60 mm; D (Ubergehause) = 70 mm; Prov.: Frau Conzertmeister Gutsche / Doberan / Mecklenburg; Referenz: Beethoven-Archiv Bonn”.
3
The video can be watched at the following link: http://www.potsdamtv.de/Stadtleben/Beethoven_Uhr-16261.html
4
For easier reference the watch purchased by Mr. Orlandi is named Sofia and the one sold at the auction is Potsdam.
5
Bellofatto L. / Orlandi A. (see n. 1), pp. 9-12.
6
Handwritten notes on the verso of the photo ref. B 738/a, Beethoven-Haus Bonn.
7
This type of work, recognized as very healthy today (and today totally prohibited given the toxicity of mercury vapors) could give the bronze a gold layer, which could then be wrought. Mercury-gilded/ silvered objects must be fired in order to evaporate the mercury, which boils at 357 degrees Celsius. Only metals that are able to withstand this high temperature can survive the process. Another requirement is that the mercury amalgam must be able to sufficiently wet the entire surface of the material; otherwise the gold or silver will not adhere. For metals, the ability of the amalgam to stick is related to solubility. It may sound strange to talk about two metals being soluble in relationship to each other, but like other chemicals, mercury will only solubilize (dissolve) some metals, such as gold, silver, and copper. Therefore, for this type of gilding to work, the substrate must be composed primarily of metals that can be dissolved by mercury. Before electroplating was invented, mercury amalgams were the best choice for producing a smooth, thick coating of gold or silver on a three-dimensional object. The process also had the advantage of being able to be repeated until a coating of the desirable thickness was achieved. Mercury gilding/silvering is rarely performed today due to its toxicity.
8
Nicolaus Zmeskall von Domanovetz (1759-1833) was an excellent cellist, official in the Hungarian Chancellery, a prominent figure in the Viennese musical circles and a close friend of Beethoven; Beethoven dedicated the string quartet (f-minor) op. 95 to him.
9
Accession Number: M/P.1 & A & B-1929 (Applied Arts Department); Reference Number: 77467.
10
At the following links: http://www.fitzwilliamprints.com/image/701733/prior-george-beethovens-silver-watch-by-george-prior, and http://www.fitzwilliamprints.com/image/701720/prior-george-beethovens-silver-watch-by-george-prior.
11
During a visit to the Fitzwilliam Museum, Luigi Bellofatto could only verify that the mechanism is working.
12
John Prior, son of William, Nessfield 1747-1820, received six awards from Society Arts for an escapement, alarum and striking work.
13
The Musical Times named Davy as G. W. Davy, but it is surely a mistake.
14
The National Archives, Catalogue reference C 16/929/D167, reports: “George Baynton Davy, son of George Thomas Davy Esq of Colston Bassett, Owthorpe Notts and 18 Sussex Square, Hyde Park, who among other appointments was Honorary Secretary of the Notts County Cricket Club from 1868-1874, sold estate of Colston Bassett in 1875; he was born on 23rd September in Valparaiso (Chile), he married Martha Jane MacKay at Cheltenham in 1871 and for the 1901 census he, with Martha Jane and five children, was living at Spean Lodge, in the district of Lochaber, Scotland, and he died at Spean Lodge, Kingussie, on 22nd December 1907. He had one brother Charles Leigh and one sister Charlotte.” Davy’s house is now a very nice hotel owned by Suzanne and Glen Wilson. The authors thank them for the information and photo provided.
15
“Catalogue of valuable autograph letters & historical documents: including the property of the late G. B. Davy, Esq. the property of Mme. Blanche Marchesi the property of J. L. Roeckel, Esq. the property of a Gentleman the property of the late Henry Richardson, Esq., Mayor of Greenwich, 1909-10 (sold by order of the Executrix) the property of Mrs. Laura E. Brooke and other properties: which will be sold by auction on Friday, July 21, and Monday, July 24, 1916”. Davy’s items are listed at lots no. 313 to 316.
16
Johann Nepomuk Emanuel Dolezalek (1780-1858), Bohemian composer and cellist who met Beethoven in 1800 . He was among composer’s visitors during his final illness.
17
BGA 2005. This letter (sign. Ms. 4243) was presented to the Royal College of Music in London by a Dr F.B. Pidduck in October 1
18
This is another version of the last movement of this sonata. The complete manuscript is in the Staats-bibliothek zu Berlin Preufiischer Kulturbesitz (shelf mark Mus. ms. autogr. Beethoven, L. v., Artaria 196).
19
Louis Koch (1862-1932), jeweler and antiquarian music collector.
20
Georg Kinsky, Die Beethoven-Handschriften der Sammlung Louis Koch, in: Neues Beethoven-Jahrbuch 5.1933 (1934), p. 54.
21
Sammlung H. C. Bodmer, shelf mark HCB BMh 2/42. For more information about Hans Conrad Bodmer (1891-1956) and his collection see: M. Ladenburger / N. Kampken, Auf den Spuren Beethovens: Hans Conrad Bodmer und seine Sammlung, Bonn 2006.
22
For more information see: Douglas Johnson, Alan Tyson, Robert Winter, The Beethoven sketchbooks: history, reconstruction, inventory, Oxford 1985, p. 241-246.
23
Domenico Artaria (1775-1842), music dealer and publisher, played a central role in the auction of Beethoven’s estate.
24
August Artaria (1807-1893) continued the activity of his father Domenico. Regarding his private collection see: Katalog der Privat-Sammlung August Artaria. Versteigerung in Wien am 6. Mai 1896 und fol-gende Tage by Artaria & Co.
25
Baron Eugen von Miller von Aichholz (1835-1919) was an Austrian Industrialist and collector.
26
Georg Kinsky (see n. 21), p. 53.
27
After Koch’s death, it, along with much of his collection, was bequeathed by Koch’s daughter, Maria Florsheim-Koch, then to her son, Georg Florsheim, himself a legendary collector; this collection is still extant and family-owned today in Basel, although diminished by sell-offs.
28
William H. Scheide (*1914) is an American musicologist, businessman, and collector. He has expanded greatly the extraordinary rare book and manuscript collection begun by his grandfather and enlarged by his father.
29
For more information about this manuscript and for its transcription, see Dagmar von Busch-Weise, Beethovens Jugendtagebuch, in: Studien zur Musikwissenschaft 25 (1962) (Festschrift fur Erich Schenk), S. 68-88. See also Stefan Zweig, Meine Autographen-Sammlung, in: Philobiblon 3 (1930), p. 290.
30
Bl. 9 v , 11 r and 12 v .
31
Shelf mark: Zweig MS 14.
32
Stefan Zweig (1881-1942) began collecting literary, historical and musical autograph manuscripts while still at school in Vienna. In the 1930s, he immigrated to Britain, and eventually became a British subject, living in London, and then in Bath. A year before his death, he left war-torn Britain for Brazil. Zweig’s heirs continued to add to the collection after his death, and, with great generosity, presented the entire collection of literature and music to the British Library in 1986.
33
Auction catalogue “Letters and manuscripts selected from the Lewes House Library formed by the late E. P. Warren, Esq., M. A. and now the Property of a Gentleman”, 3-9 June 1929, Second Day, p. 62.
34
See note 26.
35
Mrs. Mackintosh was indeed Mary Davy, the daughter of the collector G.B. Davy who married George Mackintosh.
36
he first owner after Beethoven’s death seems to have been Artaria, Vienna, as per note written by Zweig (to record card, sign. Add. MS 73167, f. 7) “Das sogenannte ‘Artaria’ Tagebuch”.
37
Ralph Hare Griffin (1854-1941) was a notable collector, Fellow of St John’s, jurist and judge.
38
This leaf 23 x 30 cm (SV 316, signature Mu. MS 289) has an accompanying note that reads “sheet of music in Beethoven’s Autograph, probably from a notebook. Movement in Db (Des). Given by Ralph Griffin, 1922, to the Fitzwilliam Museum”. “The incorrect identification of the key as Db was carried over into the listing of the leaf in H. Schmidt ‘Verzeichnis der Skizzen Beethovens, Beethoven-Jahrbuch 6, 1969, 7-128, no. 316, although Schmidt questioned its accuracy there” according to N. Marston, see note 33.
39
Nicholas Marston, Approaching the sketches for Beethoven’s “Hammerklavier” Sonata, in: Journal of the American Musicological Society 44 (1991), p. 407. The leaf is also reproduced in Figure 1 and 2.
40
This manuscript (SV 313, signature Mu. MS 288) consists of 1 leave, 24 cm, 12 staves (187mm high); the width has been cut down to 16cm from an original ca. 30cm. These are the sheets 3-6 of the complete manuscript.
41
BGA 1295, sheets 3 to 6 are at the Fitzwilliam Museum (sign. Mus Ms 1014), sheet 2 is at the Beethoven-Haus, part of the Bodmer collection (sign. HCB Br 198) and a fragment of the first sheet is at the Stadt-archiv of Trier (sign. Stadtbibliothek/Stadtarchiv Trier Autographensammlung). A sheet included in the Fitzwilliam Beethoven letter reports that it has “bequeathed by Joseph Ries to A.J. Hipkins, who owned in 1896. Given to Fitzwilliam Museum by Sir. Herbert Thompson, 1920”. Pieter Joseph Ries (1791-1882), brother of Ferdinand Ries was a musician and music teacher; he bequeathed the complete Ferdinand Ries collection and compositions to the musicologist Alfred James Hipkins (1826-1903). The Fitzwilliam museum owns another letter by Beethoven to Ries dated 6 July 1822 (BGA1479).
42
For more information on A.W. Thayer’s life, see L. Bellofatto, Alexander Wheelock Thayer. Neue Quel-len zu Person und Werk, in: BBS 5, p. 7-69. Bellofatto is working on a revised and enlarged edition of his Alexander Wheelock Thayer, the greatest biographer of Ludwig van Beethoven: a study in nineteenth-century American music, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2011.
43

Catalogue of Important and Valuable Autograph Letters and Historical Documents […] formed by the late Alexander Wheelock Thayer”, Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge, London, 1899. The manuscript is item 5 of the auction catalogue.

44
The three Schubert manuscripts are: Die Mondnacht (1815 – D. 238); Geistes-Gruss / An Mignon (1815 – D. 161 version b and D. 142 version d); Der Alpenja’ger (1817 – D. 588, version a). All three are at Fitzwilliam Museum under the sign. Mus Ms 616, 615 and 617.
45
BGA 52 (1800-1801) and BGA 35 (1798).
46
“The authors would be interested to receive any further information about this clock, which would be of much value towards the continuing research on Beethoven’s clocks.” L. Bellofatto / A. Orlandi (see n. 1), p. 19.
47
Stephan von Breuning (1774-1827) was a friend of Beethoven from the days of his youth in Bonn.
48
Alfr. Chr. Kalischer, Aus dem Schwarzspanierhause: Erinnerungen an L. van Beethoven aus seiner Jugend-zeit von Gerhard von Breuning, Berlin-Leipzig 1907, p. 45. See note 51 for more details about the Breunings.
49
Fuhrer durch die Beethoven-Zentenarausstellung der Stadt Wien: Beethoven und die Wiener Kultur seiner Zeit, Wien 1927, p. 89-90.
50
Stefan Jr. von Breuning (1894-1983) was an Austrian entomologist; he was the son of Maria Cornides von Krempach (1859-1939) and Gerhard Jr. (1848-1920), son of doctor Gerhard (1813-1892) and Pepina Gossleth (1826-1905). Gerhard von Breuning first met Beethoven as a child with his father. He was Stephan’s son by his father’s (second) marriage with Constanze Ruschowitz (1784-1856). During Beethoven’s final illness, young Gerhard, just entering his teenage years, was a frequent visitor to the Schwarz-spanierhaus. Beethoven enjoyed his company and in 1874 Gerhard published his personal recollections of Beethoven in Aus dem Schwarzspanierhaus, a readable and trustworthy account of Beethoven’s last years.
51
Plate 9 is from Ley Iconography (Beethoven-Haus Bonn, Ley, Band VI, Nr. 1144).
52
Alfred Orel, Ein Wiener Beethoven-Buch: Studien und Skizzen, Vienna 1921, “Verzeichnis der Bilder – 17.”
53
Anthony van Hoboken (1887-1993) was a collector and musicologist; he produced a definitive catalogue of Haydn’s works (J. Haydn, Thematisch-bibliographisches Werkverzeichnis, Mainz 1957, 1971, 1978). Hoboken’s private collection, amassed from 1919 onward, includes first and early editions of music from the Baroque to the late Romantic and early theory and literature. This collection was transferred to the Austrian National Library in 1974. See: Katalog der Sammlung Anthony van Hoboken in der Musiksamm-lungder Osterreichischen Nationalbibliothek: musikalische Erst- und Fruhdrucke, herausgegeben vom In-stitut fur Osterreichische Musikdokumentation, unter der Leitung von Gunter Brosche, 17 vols., Tutzing 1982-2000.
54
Beethoven-Reliquien: Auflosung der Sammlung Breuning, in: Kolnische Zeitung 22.07.1929. Most of the Beethoven relics belonged to Breuning were acquired by the collector Stefan Zweig.
55
The name of the Swiss Journal is unknown; the article (Beethoven-Haus, Bonn, Z 11023) reports a handwritten date “Juli 1953”.
56
Eine Uhr Beethovens kam wieder nach Bonn, in: Bonner Rundschau 15.07.1953, Nr. 162. The authors thank Friederike Grigat who provided copies of the articles.
57
For more information on this clock see: Bellofatto / Orlandi (see n. 1), pag 14-16.
58
Zwei Uhren Beethovens, in: Bonner Rundschau, 31.12.1955, Nr. 303.
59
Ibid.
60
The Beethoven-House at Bonn and its collection, Bonn 1965, p. 19.
61
For the early history of Black Forest clock-making, see Gerd Bender, Die Uhrenmacher des hohen Schwarz-waldes und ihre Werke, vol. 1, Villingen, 1975.
62
F. A. Schmidt / F. Knickenberg, Das Beethoven-Haus in Bonn und seine Sammlungen, Bonn 1911, p. 24.
63
The Beethoven-House at Bonn (see n. 61), p. 16.
64
See: Bellofatto / Orlandi (see n. 1), p. 14-16.
65
Armando Orlandi heartily thanks Dr. Ladenburger for having had the privilege and opportunity to repair this clock.
66
Schindler/Beethoven III 2, p. 372.
67
Maria Christine (or Christiane) Thun-Hohenstein (1765-1841) was the wife of Prince Karl Lichnowsky (1756-1814), Beethoven’s patron and friend. Beethoven lived in the Lichnowsky household for several years after he came to Vienna. Beethoven dedicated to Maria Christine Lichnowsky in 1797 the 12 variations for piano and cello on a theme from the oratorio “Judas Makkabaus” by Handel in G major (WoO 45) and in 1801 the piano arrangement of “Die Geschopfe des Prometheus” (Op. 43). She was a fine pianist and well disposed towards Beethoven.
68
Marie Schindler Egloff (ca. 1807-1882), daughter of violinist and musicologist Joseph Schindler (17581835), was a singer, active in Vienna, Pest, Berlin, Aachen and Mannheim. She spent several years with her brother Anton.
69
August Nowotny was the owner of a porcelain factory in Altrohlau, near Karlsbad in Bohemia. He acquired the Beethoven-Schindler material after Schindler’s death on 16 January 1864. The material itself comprises autographs of Beethoven; some Beethoven letters (mostly to Schindler); letters from and to other people; some other miscellaneous documentary material, not only concerning Beethoven but also Schindler; several volumes of printed music and a couple of books from Beethoven’s library. The Beethoven biographer Ludwig Nohl (1831-1885) visited Nowotny and listed the complete collection in his book: Inventarium des Beethoven schen Nachlasses, soweit sich derselbe in dem Nachlasse… Anton Schindler vorgefunden hat und zur Zeit in den Handen der Frau Marie Egloff… befindet: (jetziger Besitzer dieser Sammlung Herr Nowotny…), Karlsbad 1864; the clock is listed at p. 15 under the section “Vorhandene Reliquien von Beethoven”. Most of the books and autographs are now housed at the Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. The pieces are listed in the catalogues of the Beethoven collections of the two former Berlin State Libraries: one half in Eveline Bartlitz, Die Beethoven-Sammlung in der Musikabteilung der Deutschen Staatsbibliothek: Verzeichnis; Autographe, Abschriften, Dokumente, Briefe, Berlin 1970 of the Beethoven holdings of the former Deutsche Staatsbibliothek in East Berlin, and the rest in Hans Gunter Klein, Ludwig van Beethoven, Autographe und Abschriften: Katalog, Berlin 1975 of the West Berlin holdings. The Nachlass is recorded in the music department’s accession book under the number 18948 (1880, September 20), with the annotation “Fur 6300 MK von A. Nowotny in Altrohlau bei Carlsbad angekauft”. The author would like to thank Clemens Brenneis, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin Preufiischer Kulturbesitz, Mu-sikabteilung mit Mendelssohn-Archiv, for the information provided.
70
Carl Meinert (1844-1913) was a cloth manufacturer in Dessau and moved to Frankfurt am Main in 1904 after he retired.
71
More photos are available at the following webpage: https://www.lvbeethoven.org/Avvenimenti/Beethoven-Avvenimenti-PendolaBeethovenEngl.html.

Beethoven and the Art of Horology – Part 1: The Composer’s Watches

Beethoven and the Art of Horology – The Watches of Beethoven – Part 1

Published in Neue Beethoven Studien Vol 9 (2011) – Luigi Bellofatto (Bovisio Masciago) – Armando Orlandi (San Biagio di Valpolcevera – Genova) Beethoven and the Art of Horology. The watches of Beethoven, Tobias Haslinger and Alexander W. Thayer Part 1: The watches belonging to Beethoven

A. Pocket watches

In Fischhoff’s copy of the Verzeichnis des Beethovenschen Nachlasses found in the estate of Otto Jahn and then passed to A.W. Thayer, it states that: (1)

Die Auction fand statt 5. Nov. 1827 am Kohlmarkt No. 1149 hintere Stiege 2. Stock, unter Leitung des Schatzmeisters Anton Grafer Gesammtertrag 1140 f. 18 C.M. Gerichtliche (oder Berichtliche?) Inventur und Schatzung iiber das Verlassen-schafts Vermogen des den 26. Marz 1827 mit Testament verstorbenen Herrn Ludwig van Beethoven, Tonsetzer No. 200 in der Alservorsadt, seel, durch 8 Tage.

In the paragraph “An Praziosen”, is the following entry: 1 silberne Minutenuhr 8 f. This statement shows that Beethoven had at least one silver (pocket) watch but following long and extensive research on the subject, interesting results have emerged regarding other watches and clocks that Beethoven owned during his lifetime.(2)

The first instance in which a pocket watch owned by Beethoven is mentioned and described in any publication, appears in the issue of The Musical Times dated 15 December 1892 (p. 17), in an article devoted to Beethoven memorabilia: BEETHOVEN’S WATCH. This watch, now in the possession of G. W. Davy, Esq., is supposed to be the one which is known to have been sent by Moscheles from London. The case is of silver and of foreign manufacture, while the works are of English make. The maker, George Prior, was also a well-known violoncellist, and it is not too much to suppose that he was known to Moscheles. Another reason for favouring this supposition is that in the filigree covering of the interior works is the figure of a lyre.

The maker, George Prior, was working in Prescot Street, London between 1765 andl810. There is also a picture of the watch (plate 1). Recent research has discovered that this watch is now part of the Applied Arts Collection in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (U.K.) (3) It was donated to the Museum by Ralph Griffin, MA on 14 December 1929.(4) The case is of Continental design, and was made especially for this movement. The movement is small for the case. There is a plain silver disc to close the case opening and support the movement, and a decorated band of silver fitted under the dial. These details suggest that the case was made to fit an existing movement.

The square to set the time can also be seen on the hand clutch. As with most English watches of that time, the winding is at the rear, directly on the fiise-cone. The small chiselling for opening the rear case to wind the watch can be seen to the right. In accordance with the custom dating back to the sixteenth century, balance cocks originally had a simple, elongated form and were secured at the centre by a key. In the eighteenth century they were decorated with elaborate chasing and engraved with animals, flowers, leaves, human heads, etc. The majority of these balance cocks can be distinguished by their form:

– English, which were round with a large fastening foot.

– French or continental, which were round or oval with lateral lugs for the fixing screws.

The fact that a lyre was engraved on the watch does not signify that it belonged to or was made for a musician or composer (e.g. Beethoven), because the lyre, due solely to its shape, is depicted on the verge cocks of many watches manufactured by Prior and others. Possibly Prior was influenced by his activity as cellist; and there is another watch (a female chatelaine) by Prior that displays an allegory of Music, both on the movement and in the excellent enamels of the case.

The following details confirm that the movement was modern for its day and valuable:

– Blued steel end piece and diamond end stone, foot engraved; polished steel balance with slide plate engraved.

– The silver regulator dial has radial Arabic figures, 10, 20, and 30.

– The polished steel case bolt has a conical end, in slot in plate, rib under dial and with cylinder escapement, brass wheel and train planted clockwise.

– The dial is white enamel on copper with counter enamel and three feet; it has a ladder minute ring, dots at 5 minutes, and thick bars at quarters, vertical Arabic chapter.

– The hands are gold with arrow head and poker.

– The pendant stem is slightly tapered, top bulbous, stirrup bow with bulbous ends.

– The key is embossed, contemporary and bimetallic, cast brass with three holes in handle and swivel top.

It is interesting to observe the barrel bridge engraved with the lyre (and also horns and axes), as was noted in the article of 1892 (‘Another reason for favouring this supposition is that in the filigree covering of the interior works is the figure of a lyre’). The presentation case is of dark mauve leather decorated with a blind tooling frame and a design on the lid. There are two catches, one of which is missing. The inside of the lid is lined in white silk with “L. van Beethoven’s/Taschenuhr” in gilt lettering, the base section in deep mauve velvet with a recess for the watch and a trough for the pendant and key. It can be dated to the mid 19th century, some 40 years after the watch was manufactured (around 1800). A second silver pocket watch believed to be owned by Beethoven is mentioned in two articles which appeared close to one another in two different journals. The first one is from Neue Freie Presse dated 16 June 1925 under the title Eine merkwurdige Beethoven-Reliquie and reports:

Bei einer distinguierten Konzertmeisterwitwe G. in Norddeutschland hat sich eine silberne Taschenuhr erhalten, die ehedem in Beethovens Besitz gewesen zu sein scheint. Diese Uhr wurde noch vom alten Konzertmeister G. erworben, im Tauschwege. Es ist eine kleine Taschenuhr von netter Ausstattung und aufien mit der alten Jahreszahl 1797 versehen. Innen tragt sie das ungarische Wappen. Auf dem sonst glatten Deckel ist in alter Schrift eingraviert „Ludwig van Beethoven”. Das Ganze entspricht der Zeit um 1800 und hat fur uns nur den einzigen Mangel, dass der Name des Vorbesitzers nicht bekannt ist, von dem der Konzertmeister G. die Uhr in Berlin bekommen hat. G. hatte den Namen nicht schriftlich festgehalten und ihn einfach vergessen. Durch den Tod des Konzertmeisters ist jede Erinnerung abgerissen. Nun versucht man es, in der Oeffentlichkeit auf die immerhin sehr beachtenswerte Sache aufmerksam zu machen, um vielleicht das vollstandige Pedigree der Uhr doch noch festzustellen. The second article is from the Dresdner Anzeiger dated 25 July 1925, written by Dr. Arthur Schurig, and entitled Nochmals Beethovens Taschenuhr.

Irgendwer (hier die Konzertmeisterwitwe G. in Norddeutschland) besitzt eine silberne Taschenuhr mit einer Gravierung auf dem Deckel ,,1797“. Ob diese Zahl wirklich 1797 entstanden ist, weifi niemand. Wann irgendwer die Uhr in Besitz genommen, weifi niemand. Sie hat auch nicht feststellen lassen, ob die Uhr wirklich 1797 bezw. vor 1797 angefertigt ist. Eine weitere Gravierung lautet: „Ludwig van Beethoven”. Ob diese zweite Gravierung gleichzeitig mit der Jahreszahl 1797 eingekritzelt ist, weifi niemand. Im Jahre 1797 pflegte sich der Meister noch immer „Louis van Beethoven” zu nennen.Drittens ist ein Wappen eingraviert. Irgendwer behauptet: „ein ungarisches“. Die kleine Miihe, feststellen zu lassen, welche Familie die Wappen gefuhrt hat, ist unterblieben.As mentioned above, Beethoven’s ownership of this watch is not certain although the material (silver) and the description could confirm that it is the one recorded in the Nachlass list.

The Beethoven scholar Theodor von Frimmel reported an entry in his Beethoven Handbuch on Beethoven’s “Taschenuhr”, revealing the name of the current owner, Emmy Gutsche:

Bei Frau Emmy Gutsche in Bad Doberan (Mecklenburg) befindet sich eine nette Taschenuhr, die als ehemaliger Besitz Beethovens erworben wurde und wahr-scheinlich jenes Stuck ist, das im Nachlaßverzeichnis Beethovens vom Uhren-schatzmeister Ferdinand Leichtl mit 8 Gulden bewertet worden ist. („1 silberne Minutenuhr“ lautet die Inventarangabe. Vgl. Frimmel, „Beethovenstudien“ II, S. 177.) Die Photographien der Uhr bei Gutsche, die mir vorliegen, zeigen den glat-ten Silberdeckel mit der gewifi nicht neuen Gravierung: „Ludwig van Beethoven”, ferner das Zifferblatt und einen Teil des Inneren, auf dem ein ungarisches Wappen undeutlich zu erkennen ist.

Unfortunately he did not give any technical description of the watch or any history of it, as this was apparently unknown to him and to Frau Gutsche, but at least there is one photo of it in the collection of Stephan Ley5 and further three photos in the collection of the Beethoven-Haus. 6

The photos may have been taken in the same period as the above-mentioned articles (1920-1930) and one (shelf mark B 738/a and Ley, Band VI, Nr. 11417; see plate 2) shows the pocket watch placed on small pillow with the clock face with Roman numbers, two Louis XV style hands and a great square to set the time clearly visible. It is interesting to note the large and sturdy protective outer case, military style, for preserving the fragile internal case, which is beautifully decorated reminiscent of river pearls, and the hole at the top for the stem where it is hinged.

This ring is much flattened, reminiscent of a style more French or German than English. The handwritten words on a back of a photo (shelf mark B 738/a) attributes the ownership of this watch to Gutsche:

Uhr silber mit Schutzdeckel (Vorderan-sicht), Silberknopfchenrand auf rotlich-braungeflammter Emailleunterlage und Jah-reszahl 1797. Angebl. Taschenuhr Beethovens. Besitzerin Frau Conzertmeister Gutsche Doberan i.M.

The other photo (shelf mark B 738/c) is more interesting since it shows the opposite side of the object, with the large square (it is also possible to see the wear on the border due to continuous use), and the great military type hinge, to facilitate the bezel opening (plate 3).

The words “Ludwig van Beethoven” are engraved by burin, horizontally under the winding hole, and it is reasonable to surmise that it was done by a local German engraver, due to the Gothic block letters, small flourish and a rough “B”.

The other photo, (shelf mark B 738/b) depicts the watch with the verge opened, showing its large silvered shell and the hole to reach the square. It is also possible to see the reverse of the movement lying beneath the case.

Unfortunately it has proved impossible to ascertain the provenance of the movement, but one may still admire the impressive decorations of the plate and the fine decoration of the verge cock, here patterned with a design of two angels supporting a coat of arms, that is the official Hungarian emblem (plate 4). The rear part of the watch’s protection appears to be plate 3. Gutsche pocket watch> back view> made of burnished metal or metal covered Beethoven-Haus Bonn, B 738/c with a thin layer of black or red leather, possibly decorated with a crown of river pearls and interrupted only by the point of the pendant. The description reported by Stephan Ley on the back of the photo is quite interesting:

Taschenuhr aus dem Besitz Beethovens; auseinander genommene Einzelteile des Gehauses und Uhrwerk. – Anonyme Fotografie. N.B.: Vgl. zur Identifikation der Uhr B 738/a; verso handschriftlicher Vermerk: „No. II Oben: Riickseite v. Schutzdeckel -rotlichbraungeflammt Emaille mit Silber-knopfchenrand dieselben sind nach links durchgehend und ungehammert.

Unten: Uhr mit aufgeklappten Werk. Auf schon gravierter Platte befinden sich 6 gro-fie Rubinen die figiirliche Darstellung i. d. Mitte ist aus Silber und tragen 2 Engel mit Fliigel eine Krone anscheinend 7 zackig das Wappen ist langs fein gerippt und hat links 3 Striche. Daneben sieht es aus wie ein zweigeteiltes Kreuz auf Krone Innenseite Gravierung ROST SALZBURG. Salzbg. ist mit dem Pinsel auf der Platte nachgezogen da die Schrift so klein und daher undeutlich war.“

Stephan Ley, who very probably saw this watch, added important information as to its dimensions; the name of the maker (a certain Rost of Salzburg), and that the movement had six large rubies. This last detail is most interesting, as at the end of the 18th century most watch movements used brass buckles instead of jewels (except on the verge cock); so this small distinction indicates that it is a movement of considerable elegance and value.

The dimensions of the watch are reported on the verso of a photo (shelf mark B 738/c; see plate 3) with the following handwritten note: Riickseite der Uhr (silber) mit vollem Namenszug. OriginalgroSe der Uhr mit Schutzdeckel: 7 1/2 cm, ohne Ring ohne Schutzdeckel: 6 1/2 cm. Grofie d. Wer-kes: 4,07 cm.

The watch was shown in Vienna in 1927 at a wonderful and valuable exhibition that ran during the Centennial celebrations of the death of the German composer, and its catalogue entry at item 488 reports: (8)

Taschenuhr, vielleicht aus B.s Besitz. Aufien ist die Jahreszahl ,,1797“, auf dem Riickdeckel das Merk [sic] „L. van Beethoven” eingraviert. Besitzer: Frau Kon-zertmeister E. Gutsche, Bad Doberan.

This watch, which was acquired by Gutsche in 1916, is believed to have been owned by Beethoven, but as Frimmel noted, this cannot be confirmed. Gutsche himself did not know the identities of any of its owners since Beethoven, so was probably not told about them by the person who sold it to him. If this is indeed the watch owned by Beethoven, it may also be supposed that it is the one that Nicolaus Zmeskall von Domanovetz (1759-1833)9 gave to Beethoven as gift.

A few letters and conversation notes show that Zmeskall was strongly involved in watch affairs and in a purchase of a good repeating watch, as discussed in a further section of this article.

Although it has not been possible to confirm the authenticity of Beethoven’s ownership, it can reliably be said that the characteristics of the watch are consistent with those manufactured in Germany at the end of the 18th century, which would authenticate the date 1797 engraved upon it. Unfortunately we are not able to identify or confirm which was the “Silberne Minutenuhr” listed in Beethoven’s estate as the one belonging to Mr. Davy or the one to Mr. Gutsche, or if either actually belonged to Beethoven at all. A third pocket watch believed to has been owned by Beethoven is now in a private Austrian collection and it was made by Jean Etienne Piot. Since 1836 this watch has been in the possession of a (since 1836) noble family in Austria whose ancestors (father and son) moved from Koblenz to Vienna in 1801. The son became a colleague of Stephan von Breuning in the Hofkriegsrat. The father married Anna Katharina Wistorff from Koblenz who was a cousin of Beethoven’s mother.

Joseph Willibrord Mahler made several portraits of members of the family in Vienna. At that time the family was in close contact with Joseph von Henikstein who was on friendly terms with Beethoven. There is no document concerning the watch neither in the family nor in Beethoven’s estate. According to an old tradition in the family, this watch was a gift from their ancestors to Beethoven. But it is not likely that Beethoven gave back the watch (and three other items) during his lifetime. The watch was exhibited in a Mahler exhibition of the Historische Museum in Vienna in the 1960s where it was attributed to Beethoven according to the family tradition without official confirmation. This watch has an enamelled dial, engraved with Arabic numbers, with minute and quarter hour markings, the winding hole at 2 o’clock and with its brass protection, and the name of the maison J. Et Piot10. It can be dated around 1770-1790. The production of this firm was limited and not particularly well known, as they manufactured traditional tbauches, and all with the fusee-cone escapement and chain, as this watch probably belonging to Beethoven. The movement and its parts are rather “spartan”, with a simple decoration of the verge cock, and a silvered disc engraved with “Avance” and “Retard” and the verge without any decoration except the name of the maker. The case is more interesting, spherical, and decorated with pentagons, that seems to be made of brass (or gold) made, with the number “29”, just under the opening button of the double case. The base of the mechanism is fixed by four big steel screws, and the hinge with two screws. Then the watch does not have the protection glass, as was usual for this type of watches, and as a consequence the hour hand is damaged; it is missing the last part of the hour hand.

B. Beethoven’s Tischstanduhr preserved at the Beethoven-Haus in Bonn.

The only clock surely owned by Beethoven is kept at the Beethoven-Haus Bonn and it was given to Beethoven as gift from the Princess Christine Lichnowsky. It came into Anton Schindler’s possession after the death of the master, as did many of his other personal belongings:

Unter den vom Verfasser aufbewahrten Reliquien befinden sich:

a) eine Pendeluhr in Form einer umgesturzten Pyramide mit einem kleinen

Frauenkopf von Alabaster. (Ein Geschenk der Fiirstin Lichnowsky).11

It was then purchased by the collector Carl Meinert. Car lMeinert (1844-1913) was a cloth manufacturer (Tuchfabrikant) in Dessau and moved to Frankfurt am Main in 1904 after he retired. He sold the Beethoven items to the Beethoven-Haus in 1898, all the relics (“Leuchter; Landschaft aus Beethovens Haaren, Spazierstock, 2 Brillen, Standuhr, Stahlfeder, Gansefeder, Monokel, Brutus, Tischglocke, Kosaken als Briefbeschwerer, Rasiermesser, 2 Petschaften und die Visitenkarte samt Druckplatte”), together with two letters and the autograph manuscript of the Moonlight Sonata (Op. 27, no.2). It is listed in the catalogue of the Bonn Beethoven-Exhibition of 11-15 May 189012 as:

Standuhr Beethoven’s in Form einer umgesturzten Pyramide, mit Frauenkopf als Bekronung. Bes.: C. Meinert in Dessau.

It is also mentioned in a book on the Beethoven-Haus collection, published in 1904, as being part of the collection at that time:13

Eine Fulle kleinerer Gegenstande, zum Teil vom Schreibtisch Beethovens, fruher im Besitze von A. Schindler, spater Hauptstiicke der Sammlung des Herrn K. Meinert in Dessau und dank dem hochherzigen Entgegenkommen des Letzteren 1898 fur unsere Sammlung erworben […] Eine Abbildung davon ist diesem Berichte beigegeben […]

4. Standuhr Beethovens in Form einer umgekehrten Pyramide, und mit Frauenkopf als Bekronung.

The clock’s dimensions are circa 38.5 x 13.5 x 14.0 cm. It stands on a base with bronze lion’s paw feet, and is surmounted by a small ivory bust reminiscent of the portraits of Roman empresses.

The description in German by the Beethoven-Haus, which is useful for the details, reports:

Uhrgehause in Form einer umgesturzten Pyramide auf bronzenen LowenfuSen und flachem Sockel; Bekronung in Form einer antikisierenden weiblichen Biis-te (in der Art der Portrait-Biisten romischer Kaiserinnen); Zifferblatt Porzellan mit Glasdeckel; nebst zugehorigem Schliissel. Osterreich, 1. Viertel 19. Jahrhun-dert. – Holz, Gips, Metall.

This clock with dial charge on the six, eight days spring and contemporary movement ‘demi carre’ national production, was probably possessed by Beethoven during the years 1815-1820.

The style is pre-Biedermaier and it is without any alarm or striking works at the hour or half hour, as was in use at that time, and needless to the German composer due to his deafness; it could be dated around 1810.

A photo of it is included in the Ley Iconography (Ley, Band VI, Nr. 1140) where it is possible to observe that one of the four gilded brass flowers around the clock case (the one at the bottom right) is missing (plate 5).

It is already missing in a very early photo of the late 19th century.14 Today the clock has two flowers missing, both at the bottom; it is possible that this second loss occurred in 1969 when the museum was restored and a new permanent exhibition was established. It may have Lbeen that the clock was restored at the same time as well.

This restoration, as is possible to compare from the actual sight of the clock and the photo in the Ley collection, made repairs to standard damage to clocks of this type: damage to the enamel on the winding hole, at hour six, and at hours nine and three. Very probably the suspension was replaced as well, as it is possible to observe that the disc of the pendulum is staggered with respect to its usual and natural collocation at the centre of the window.

The small bust on the top of the clock could represent a Roman empress or maybe, as was popular in other objects of the same period, a simple female representation of the Roman Virtus (virtue), or as Cornelia or Lucretia; examples of marital fidelity.

C. Beethoven’s Kommodenstanduhr preserved at the Pasqualatihaus in Vienna

This is a second clock that was certainly owned by Beethoven and came from his personal collection at Heiligenstadt.15 It was presented to the Wien Museum (Historical Museum of the City of Vienna) by the secretary of the Vienna Beethoven Society, Josef Bock-Gnadenau in 1896.

It is supposed to have been placed above the small chiffonier (Nachtkastchen) that was recalled by Gerhard von Breuning when he drew the plan of Beethoven’s last lodging16, as it is shown in some photos dating from the 1920s (plate 7).17

It is listed along with the Nachtkastchen in the catalogue of the Vienna centennial exhibition of 1927 at item “422. Standuhr” as belonging to the Historisches Museum der Stadt Wien, which took a major role in this exhibition. It had been previously shown in the exhibition at the Stadt Wien in December 1920 and listed in its catalogue at item 252.18

It is made of metal, with a wood base and columns of cherry wood. Its dimensions are 29 x 18 x 10 cm, and it is inscribed (in German) “Messingwerk mit Hakengang, Gang-dauer 1 Tag, Gehause Kirschholz, Messing-trommel”.

It is a fine example of an “economic” German product from the end of the 18th century: a national clockwork with a little simple pendulum “a goutte”, and it is most likely to have been made between 1785 and 1795. The enamelled dial, protected by a round glass, is of interest. As was typical of the period it has Roman numbers, but those at the quarters are Arabic, in imitation of a contemporary French style.

The dial is screwed to the clockwork by two small (and un-aesthetic) screws at the three and the nine; and it is possible to observe that it has the usual damage caused by prolonged use: the breaking up of the enamel portion under the charge hole, and the break of the opening hinge at the nine, as may be noted in many examples of clocks of the same period.

On the back there is a brass and mercury-gilded grid that partially hides the fabric net used to protect the works from dust, and which acted as sound box in clocks with striking works.

D. The Standuhr shown in two early 20th century photos of Beethoven memorabilia

There are two interesting and rare photos that show some furniture and Beethoven memorabilia, most of which still exists. In both of them it is possible to see the above-mentioned Nachtkastchen and the clock upon it, but what is most interesting is the presence of the it standing in two different positions. The first photo (part of the collection of Dominique Pr6vot, president of the A.B.F., Association Beethoven France), shows the dock in a big wooden Morbier-type case with large glasses and the weights visible (plate 8). It is reasonable to suppose that it dates from around the early 19th century, having a white enamel case, Roman numbers, and very prominently a large brass ring nut at the centre of the hands. The winding of this clock is mechanical, done by pulling on the two chains that carry the pine-cone weights. In this type of clock a wheel-revolving ferrule was used to set the morning alarm. The alarm, moved by a “T” hammer, struck a gong. In fact, though partially hidden by the decoration painted on the wooden base, there is nevertheless visible a large gong, absolutely typical for this type of movement. The other photo (Beethoven-Haus Bonn, Ley, Band VI, Nr. 1144, Standort: XXX) shows the same clock correctly leaning against the wall (plate 9). From these two photos (plate 8 and 9) it is not possible to determine the duration of the winding, but as is customary for this type of clock (known as a ‘Schwarzwalder’), it is likely to be for eight days. Some other information that probably refers to this clock is offered by Breuning himself in his book where he reports:

Aus jener Zeit stammt eine noch in meinem Besitze befindliche Schwarzwalder-Uhr, welche Beethoven damals meinem Vater schenkte.19

Thus it is possible to infer from this information that this clock was given to Breuning as gift from Beethoven, which would explain why it is not listed in Beethoven’s estate which was written after his death. However, the clock is mentioned later in the catalogue of the exhibition held in the Stadt Museum in 1920 and in the Centennial one, again in Vienna in 1927, under the chapter „Koje Hausrat Beethovens”20 as belonging to the grandson of Beethoven’s close friend, Stephan von Breuning:

419. Schwarzwalder Uhr. H. Dr. Stefan Breuning, Wien. Geschenk B.s an St. v. Breuning

Unfortunately there appears to be no further information or any reliable confirmation that the clock shown in these photos is really the one owned or used by Beethoven and later given to Breuning.21 E. References to watches in Beethoven’s correspondence and conversation books There are a few references to watches or clocks in Beethoven’s conversation books. The first is dated at the end March 1819 and is in the Heft 2, Bl. 8r where Beethoven wrote:

Papier Balbier- / mefier – Erzherzogl [iche] / quittung – uhr – / Hosentrager / losch-papier22.

The meaning of this sentence can be explained by reading and integrating it with another note written on the internal cover of the Heft 3, dated November 1819:

Die uhr heute abhohlen / FedermeSer / Zahnpulw.[er]23.

The last sentence is related to the previous one, but unfortunately it is not possible to understand which type of fixing led Beethoven to take the watch to be repaired. However, due to the long waiting time, it is reasonable to surmise that the fixing required replacement some parts that were not available in the mender’s, such as a broken verge due to a fall, or the fusee cone chain.

It may also be supposed that Beethoven had talked about the purchase of a new watch, as he notes in the same book, a few pages later (Bl. 30v):24

UHRMACHER: Die Rep[etier] Uhr N 3 Gold / mit goldnen Blatt gantz / gute Arbeit 250 f.25 – Eine mehr ordinaire Rep[etier] Uhr 180 – Die 2 silb: [ernen] Uhren 80 f – kommt auf 100 f – Eine gute – 40 f – ordinaire 30.

It is also possible to deduce that if Beethoven had purchased one of the above watches, the one listed in his Nachlass could be either the “ordinaire” one for 30 f or the other priced at 40 f. Beethoven seems to have been interested in and fascinated by the repeater watches, which were very popular and much in use at the time, even though they tended to be very expensive. In a letter to his friend Count Nikolaus Zmeskall von Domanovecz dated December 1815, Beethoven wrote:26

Lieber Zmeskall!

Es wird der bekannte Uhrmacher Wohnhaft gleich an der Freyung zu ihnen kommen, ich mogte eine sehr gute repetiruhr haben, er verlangt 40 # – da sie sich gerne mit d.[er]g.[leichen] abgeben, bitte ich sie, sich auch von meinetwegen damit abzugeben, und mir eine Vortreffliche Uhr auszumitteln –

Freyung, the place mentioned in the letter, was one of the most enchanting locations in Vienna, surrounded by the splendid palaces of Harrach, Ferstel and Kinsky. It was in the previous year that the first public performance of Beethoven’s trio for piano, violin and cello, op. 97 took place. During the time that Beethoven was there he maybe knew about the watchmaker mentioned. However, we do not have a record of Zmeskall’s reply or if the object had actually been purchased. A watchmaker is mentioned in another letter which Beethoven wrote to his friend Zmeskall in 1816:

Lieber Z!

[… ] ich brauchte einen Bedienten, u. HauShalterin u. Bediente kostete zu viel, zudem fand ich sie mehrmal bey ihrem Manne unten beym Uhrmacher in mei-nem Hause, ja sie wollte sogar eben von da mit ihm ausgehn, da ich sie doch brauchte, daher liefi ich ihn wiederkommen, da ich der wohnung halber Sie behalten muste, hatte ich ihn nicht genommen so war ich um so viel mehr betrogen worden –27

A watch plays a part in Beethoven’s family history on two sad occasions: the death of his brother Karl and the suicide attempt of his nephew Karl. A watch (“Eine Silberne Sack Uhr, eine grofie schone alabasterne u. eine kleine ohngefahr vor 4 Jahren wurde vertauscht gegen andre d.[er] g.[leichen]”28) was listed in the inventory of the estate of Ludwig’s brother, Kaspar Anton Karl who died on 15 November 1815 of tuberculosis. An extract from the inventory was communicated by Dr. August Schmidt to Alexander W. Thayer and reported in the third volume of his Life of Beethoven:29

Praciosen, eine silberne Uhr – 25 fl.

In his letter to Anton Pachler dated 22 April 1816 30 the composer mentioned his intention to be accompanied to the Alsergasse where the estimate of his brother Karl’s estate31 would be determined; it seems therefore that the inventory had not been made before the above-mentioned letter.

It is well-known that Kaspar Karl, in his will, assigned guardianship of his son Karl both to his wife and to Ludwig, (31) apparently with the hope that in their concern for the boy the two would put aside their long-standing animosity. They did not, and the cumulative effect of years of bitter wrangling contributed in no small way to the nephew’s decision to attempt suicide. Another watch was involved in that tragic incident. On 5 August 1826, the nephew Karl pawned his watch, bought two new pistols and drove to Baden. Next morning he went to the Helenenthal, one of his uncle’s favourite spots, and discharged both weapons to his temple. Fortunately neither bullet penetrated the skull, and when the injured young man was found he was carried back to Vienna, to his mother’s house. There is no trace today of these two watches. If they still exist they have been lost.

E. Iconography

Iconographical evidence is very scarce: in fact there are no known paintings or other pictures showing Beethoven with a pocket watch nor are there drawings of any clock. However, Joseph Eduard Teltscher drew some sketches of the composer dying and in one of these it is possible to see the internal part of a pendulum of a wall clock, and in an easy position to wind from the bed (plate 10). There is no trace of this clock today, but it could be also identified as a barometer. In one of the three paintings by Isidor Neugass32 (1780-1847), precisely in the Brunsvik copy, it is possible to see a chain but it may just as well be connected to an eyeglass as to a watch. Max Unger had the opportunity to admire this painting in Mrs. Jenny Finaly’s house in Florence and reported the following description:

Die vom Bildoval freigelassenen vier Ecken sind erdfarben, der Ovalgrund dun-kelgriin. Grundiert war das Portrat violett; das sieht man an einer abgeblatter-ten Stelle. Der braune Mantel bedeckt die rechte Schulter, und von der linken gleitet er eben herab. Rock oder Frack: jedenfalls dunkelblau. Zwischen der wei-fien Weste und dem weifien Hemd ist etwas Erdbeerfarbenes, doch tritt das gar wenig hervor. Was zuerst als eine das Hemd iiberquerende Kette erscheint, ist keine Kette. Es sind zwei Ziige eines goldgelben Bandes, deren jeder seinerseits aus zwei sehr lose umeinander sich schlingenden Bandchen besteht.33

The second painting is the portrait kept at the Museo Internazionale e Biblioteca della Musica di Bologna, recently restored (shelf mark B 39116). The artist is not known nor is the date, but it appears to show Beethoven at about the age of 35. What it is interesting is the long dark chain visible from a buttonhole at the top left towards a hidden jacket pocket at the right. This is the only (although doubtful) iconographic testimony we have today. Another source is the portrait of Nikolaus Johann van Beethoven (brother of the composer, well know to be a “land-owner”) painted by Leopold Gross in 1841. Although the portrait was not realized until fourteen years after the composer’s death, a large gold pocket watch chain is clearly visible.

Part 2: The pocket watch belonging to Tobias Haslinger

Robert Haslinger, or Tobias as he is better know, was born in 1787 in Zell (near Zell-hof, Austria) and died on 18 June 1842 in Vienna. He was an editor and a close friend of Beethoven. After spending his boyhood in Salzburg, he was trained in music by Franz Xaver Gloggl in Linz. In 1810 he was living in Vienna where he dedicated most of his time to music, and his works for piano were published, largely thanks to his friend’s publishers in that town. In 1813 Sigmund Anton Steiner (1773-1838) engaged him as manager of his art and music shop and two years later he became Steiner’s partner. On 11 March 1826 Haslinger became the director of the company and obtained a license to trade under his own name. Later he employed fifty people at the premises in the Paternostergasschen, and was followed into the business by his son Karl (1816-1868).

Beethoven’s correspondence contains many letters and notes addressed to Haslinger. The earliest known is dated 1815 and the last is dated 7 December 1826. Beethoven wrote for him the canon “O Tobias! O Tobias! Dominus Haslinger! o! o!” (WoO 182) and other musical sketches, which may be found in the letters (WoO 205 c, g-k). Many of Beethoven’s own works were published by Haslinger. Haslinger visited Beethoven during his last illness and was one of the torchbearers at his funeral. The pocket watch belonging to Tobias Haslinger is now in possession of Armando Orlandi (plate 11). It has a diameter of 53 mm and a weight of 97 grams. The gilt brass verge movement with round pillars and elaborately pierced full-width cock is signed by Bevil, Ipswich 20195. Bevil was a watchmaker who was very active in London and Ipswich at the end on the 18th century and during the first 30 years of the 19th century. The verge is decorated with a flower pattern so well refined that it is reminiscent of the contemporary productions of Markwick Markham; it is also worthy of note that its movement is identical to other contemporary watches made by Robinson in London (one example dated 1833 is still existing) and it is possible to confirm that the ibauche used for the Haslinger watch was of a type largely used by watch makers due to its durability and adaptability. The dial is of ivory enamel with Roman numbers and it is decorated with a miniature landscape painted in oils depicting a castle on the bank of a small river. On the back of the case is the inscription “T. Haslinger Wien. 1824”, whose style is similar to that used for inscribing watches made in Great Britain at the time, rather than the gothic script used in Germany (plate 12). This is yet another possible, if tenuous link between Beethoven and Great Britain, bearing in mind that 1824 was year of the first performance of the 9th Symphony (op. 125). In this instance Moscheles might have been the main agent in the acquisition and delivery of this handsome gift. There is no any sign of warranty. It was customary to engrave some reference to a repair on the inside of the watch case (in this instance of gilded brass) but there is no evidence of any such engraving, so it would seem that the watch has not needed repair sincel824. Inside the back of the watch case there is small piece of paper with handwritten words (plate 12), very difficult to read: “Fu[e]r meinen / Freund Tobias / Seit [?] 1824” and followed by an undecipherable signature, maybe “Schumann” (surely not Robert!).

Part 3: Gold pocket watch belonging to Alexander Wheelock Thayer

Every reader will be aware that history’s most important, most revered Beethoven scholar is the American Alexander Wheelock Thayer (born in South Natick, Massachusetts, October 17 or 22,1817; died in Trieste, Italy, July 15,1897)34. He wrote his monumental and authoritative Life of Ludwig van Beethoven in three volumes which were published in German in 1866, 1872 and 1879, which is an extremely detailed and accurate portrayal of Beethoven’s life. His English manuscript was translated by his friend Hermann Deiters (1833-1907), whom he met when he was in Bonn in 1860s. Thayer’s adoration of Beethoven seems to have developed while he was at Harvard, and Beethoven had been dead for only 16 years by the time Thayer graduated from Harvard to take up position as a law librarian.

In 1849 he travelled to Germany, collecting material for this work. He returned to the US in late 1851, joining the staff of the New York Tribune. In 1854 he went again to Europe where he spent much of the remainder of his life. In 1862 Thayer was appointed to the US Legation in Vienna, and in 1865 he became consul in Trieste, a position he held until his death. Thayer earned his living as the United States Consul in Trieste, which then was part of the Austrian Empire. During his many years there, from the end of 1864 to 1897, he resided in an apartment on the second floor of the Palazzo Ralli at via Belpoggio no. 2, on the coastal drive, and when he died, he was buried in Trieste. While based in the city, Thayer sought every opportunity to return to Austria and Germany to work on his monumental biography of Beethoven.

It was during these last years in Trieste that he purchased the gold pocket repeater watch he used until his death. The peculiarity of this watch was that it was designed to be used by people with sight or eye problems as it had a movement that struck the hour on demand by activating a slide. During the latter 25 years of his life Thayer indeed suffered from headaches and problems with his eyes; an ailment that started in 1852 while he was employed as journalist for the New York Tribune, and when he had to spend much time working at night without adequate light. This eye problem is reported in many of the letters Thayer sent to his friends; an example may be found in a letter dated 1 January 1876 where Thayer wrote: My dear Deiters, and now we write 1876! Oh, how tempus fugit! I hoped to send you the rest of the third volume before this, but for the last two months my official duties have increased as never before, and in December I had a sad time with my eyes. In another letter to his translator Hermann Deiters dated 4 January 1878 he wrote:

I am and have been for some five weeks engaged upon the year 1819, but at this season I have so many and such constant interruptions from official duties, that for six, eight, or ten days at a time, I must leave Beethoven to his fate. The pressure on my time, my eyes and my brain will soon be somewhat less, and the hope is vivid that the work will go again more rapidly. And again in April 1882 while he was working on Beethoven’s sale of the Missa So-lemnis Thayer sent a detailed description of this event to Deiters for inclusion in the work, as confirmed in his letter dated 3 April 1882: My eyes pain me much, and I ought not to attempt writing; but there is one subject on which I must put you in the right. It is the very unpleasant and sad matter of Beethoven’s sale of the “Missa Solemnis”. In a letter dated Christmas Day 1891 again to Deiters he wrote that he had entered my 75th year under unlucky auspices; for besides my old head trouble, my eyes suddenly failed me and for weeks. [… ] My mind was in sad confusion. I could not think that it is, I was incapable of pursuing a train of thought […] writing letters (as at this moment) strains my eyes and cannot be long continued. In a very touching letter written to Grove on 17 November 1892 Thayer expressed:

Some years ago, I forget how many, you proposed to give or obtain for me pecuniary aid. I refused then, and do now, to accept charity -1 have (God knows how!) battled my way 75 years, and which to still remain in harness. I can live, if no calamity occurs, upon what I have (using my capital) until the end comes. But I must abandon the hope of finishing the Beethoven book, for I cannot pay an assistant, nor can I go away now and then to recruit. [… ] Head and eyes grow louder and louder in their warnings to stop. I obey. The above references show that Thayer had a serious and chronic problem with his eyes, hence his use of a chiming watch. This watch is designed to “repeat” the time by the activation of a small slide on the right side. It repeats the hour (grande son-nerie) and the quarter (petite sonnerie), with two different bell sounds (plate 14).

Although Thayer never spoke about his watch in any of the 300 extant letters which have been studied, it was mentioned in his testament. Thayer died in Trieste on 15 July 1897 and his will was filed (no. 45351) in the afternoon of 16 July 1897 at the Middlesex Probate Court in East Cambridge, as resident in Natick (his native town). Lawyer Jabez Fox, the husband of Thayer’s niece Susan Elisabeth, was named as executor and formally appointed 21 September 1897. The will was dated and signed by Alexander Wheelock Thayer on 26 January 1897 in the presence of Messrs J. B. Rovelli, Max von Jablonsky and Basil Bryce, all living in Trieste.35 At item three of the will Thayer wrote: I give and bequeath to the son of my said niece Susan E. Fox my gold repeater watch. In contrast to other objects he owned (Beethoven memorabilia, paintings, manuscripts and collectables), Thayer mentioned specifically his gold watch in his will, as he considered it something important enough to pass on to his successors. The watch is a typical Hunter of generous dimensions with a diameter of 50 mm and weighing 115 grams. It still has its original box, made of cherry wood and violet velvet with the following inscription (plate 15):

Repetition remontoir AMI Sandoz & fils 91504

The watch still has its splendid gold chain from the same period (marine net type) with snap-hook, “T” buttonhole and safety ring. The colour is slightly different (a darker yellow) and the weight is 38 grams. The chain of this watch is visible in a photo of A. W. Thayer dated 1897, the last year of his life. The watch case is made of 18 carat gold and has on the back a typical design of a shield, into which the owner’s initials would usually be engraved. On the other side there is an anonymous “guilloche” pattern. Inside the cuvette are the following words which identify the watch type: Repetition Remontoir Ancre leves visibles 22 rubis Balancier compensateur Spiral Breguet N°99550 The pocket watch has striking mechanism for the hour and the quarter, a Crown watchmaking; the lever for pallets is visible on the upper part of the movement and it has 22 jewels (rubies). The balance is constructed of two different materials, steel and brass, to compensate for thermal expansion and contraction.

The balance-spring is a „Spiral a Breguet“ type (from the name of the well-known watchmaker who invented and patented this type of balance-spring), and the last number is the manufacturer’s serial number for this design. It is possible to observe evidence of at least seven repairs, noted on the internal part of the watch case. From the tags it would appear that Thayer had a trusty watchmaker, since four of the seven have the same tag or acronym: A13084, A30853, A31327 and A43347. The last is PW57374. The remaining tags read 412873pdl and 425412. These tags were used by watchmakers as a record of when the watch was repaired and as a warranty. There is another engraving near the hinge which is difficult to read and yet another inscription behind the dial with the following words: “decl896”. This is the only inscription where it is possible to ascertain the exact date of a repair, i.e. December 1896. It may be presumed that it was the last one, since Thayer died in July the following year and during the last months of the life he was very ill and spent most of the time in his apartment.36
It has been recently checked and repaired by Armando Orlandi; it was shown at the Special Exhibition on A. W. Thayer at the Beethoven-Haus Bonn (19th May to 5th September 2010): “Dedicated to Beethoven, the MAN” Beethoven’s biographer Alexander Wheelock Thayer. The dial is of white enamel with Roman tunes and second hand at VI. Two of the three pointers are decorated with three small diamonds.

The house of A M I Sandoz37 & Son was active in Geneva in the 19th century and there are records that mention it from the 1820s through to the 1870s. In 1835, the business was operating from No. 55 Rue Rousseau in Geneva, as watchmakers that specialized in beautifully crafted complicated pieces. The firm was also registered as winner of a silver medal at the Paris Universal Exhibition of 1878. The British Museum keeps a Sandoz watch having a chronometer movement from the end of the 19th century with cut, compensated two arm balance, helical hairspring with terminal curve and decorated bridges in the form of a bird with outstretched wings.

Appendix

The first mechanical escapement: the verge escapement. Since the two pocket watches belonging to Beethoven and the one belonging to Haslinger had the verge with fuse cone and chain mechanism it would be pertinent to describe this particular type of escapement. From the beginning of the 16th century the verge escapement remained in use unchallenged for over 250 years. It derived its working principle from the mechanisms of big belfry clocks, already in use in the 13th century. After the introduction of the balance spring in 1675 by Huygens, there was an improvement in watch precision, thanks to autonomous oscillation. Notwithstanding several experiments thought to have been carried out mainly by Perron, the decline of the verge began at the start of the 19th century, when a new protagonist, the cylinder escapement, emerged to supplant it.

The escapement effectively has two tasks: to brake the speed of the gearing, and at the same time to give to the balance wheel a periodical push, possibly homogeneous, thus giving a regular oscillation to the movement. This oscillation is divided into three phases: 1 phase of impulse 2 phase of completion 3 phase of return or beginning. It is interesting to note that in Beethoven’s time the majority of verge wheels were made of brass and the verge itself of steel.

The attached picture (plate 16) is taken from the Encyclopedic Methodique, published in Padua (Italy) in 1787 and shows parts of a classic verge movement. This particular one was made in France, but the type was manufactured in several other countries. Fig. 7 shows the complete movement of a typical watch at verge; at three quarter view with a chiselled verge cock; the great fusee-cone (picture B), and the wheel with a vertical cog, known as the Catherine Wheel, the name probably derived from the martyr St. Catherine of Alexandria who was famously put to death on two large wheels. Fig. 9 shows the fusee-cone (F) with the large fusee-cone chain (H). This fusee includes a “winding stop” mechanism to prevent the mainspring and fusee from being wound too far, thus causing the chain to break (G), and very important, the barrel of the spring that contains the spring itself (Fig. 10). The reason for this somewhat complicated construction was that springs were made concentric, as shown in Fig. 10, as at the time it was not yet possible to manufacture the S-type spring.

The spring had much more power at full winding than it had after it had been discharged, thus accelerating the movement of the watch for the first hours after winding, then progressively decelerating. The fusee-cone chain, wound on the fiisee-cone, which narrows gradually, balances this traction, homogeneously distributing the power of the spring. Fig. 12 shows the barrel with the wide bottom grooves of the fusee, winding from the bottom to the top. In Fig. 11 it is possible to see the method used to adjust the time to the mechanism. Usually the lever (t) together with the small wheel (s) was placed on a large aluminium disc, (at the time aluminium was considered a valuable material), and engraved with “Avance” and “Retard”, or in the watches manufactured in England “Fast” and “Slow”, a practice still used today in the modern “remontoir” (automatic and mechanical) watches.Fig. 14 shows the balance wheel (B), the spiral, and the long “foliot” of the verge, with its two blades that act on the escapement wheel shown in Fig. 16. At Fig. 17 the escapement wheel is shown from the side. In this type of mechanism there were usually 13 tilted teeth, which is the case with Haslinger’s pocket watch.

Then it is impossible to not admire the amazing workmanship that went into the construction of the fusee-cone chain. Each section is hand-made from single figure-of-eight links with passing holes. Because the fusee-cone chain was usually in traction and therefore under tension which was released when the watch was discharged, it is easy to appreciate how much this particular part was prone to breakage, thus necessitating the attentions of a watchmaker.

Beethoven mentions in his conversation-books that he had to take his watch for repair; in fact it appears that the watch had a tendency run slow at a rate of about 10 minutes per day, as can be evidenced from an example from a conversation with Oliva in 1820:

es ist halb zwey Uhr, wenn Sie zum Blochlinger wollen so bleiben Sie hier und ich finde Sie nach Tisch in der Stadt Ihre Uhr geht zu spat, es ist mehr als Vi zwey Uhr38 ich muss ungefahr noch eine Stunde zu Hause sein; – nach Vi zwolf Uhr komme ich zu Doll Ihre Uhr geht 10 Minuten zu spat, es schlagt eben dreyviertel auf eilf Uhr Sie konnen hienaus gehen und wir treffen uns um 12 Uhr39

During Beethoven’s lifetime (1770-1827), the art of horology was subjected to considerable evolution. It was due both to historical influences and to the influence of Abraham Louis Breguet, whose work was at the peak of its excellence during the period 1794-1823. He was born in 1747 at Neuchatel (Switzerland) and he stands as far to the forefront of horology as Beethoven does for music: Breguet was the most important and intuitive figure in horologic history, as his innovations such the anti-shock system for the balancer verge or cylinder, the perpetual calendar, the “gong clock” etc., show. External influences also have to be taken into consideration, especially the continual wars, first within Revolutionary France and then during the Napoleonic era against the powers of the Entente. These conflicts, apart from some short breaks of a few months, ran from 1789 to 1815. As result of military demand, the watchmakers were requested to improve the mechanism of their products, and also to improve upon ballistic calculation in artillery. It was during that time that the French introduced the system of Jean-Baptiste Vaquette de Gribevaul. Other important and active contemporaries were Bergmiller in Paris, and the Robert family. Also during this period there was a considerable demand for mechanical dolls, the Flotenuhr (musical clock) and the first metronome. If Breguet was the foremost exponent of the art of mass horology, Pierre Jaquet-Droz from Neuchatel was the foremost innovator in the manufacture of the mechanical automaton. While visiting the museum in Neuchatel one may find much of interest so far as mechanical music is concerned:

Cette “Musicienne” possede un corps, une tete, des bras et des doigts capables d’accomplir differents mouvements naturels. Elle est apte, en outre, a executer sur un petit orgue cinq morceaux differents avec beaucoup de precision: la tete et les yeux peuvent bouger dans toutes les directions. Elle peut regarder, alternativement, la partition et ses propres doigts. A la fin de chaque morceau, la gra-cieuse musicienne fait la r£v£rence au public, en bougeant la tete et en inclinant le corps. La gorge bouge egalement, comme si elle respirait, et les spectateurs ont reellement cette impression.40

The museum also exhibits Flotenuhren, which are horological instruments able to reproduce music written on rolls. This coincidence leads directly to the fact that Beethoven was a friend of Count Deym (1752-1804). He was an eclectic person who was forced to leave Vienna after killing an opponent in a duel, and he returned only in 1790 to open the famous “Gallery of the Wonders”, otherwise known as the Ka-binett of the Hofstatuarius Muller. The Gallery was a great success, so much so that in 1796 it had to be reorganized within larger rooms, including the so-called Miillersches Kunst Cabinet.

In a newspaper of the time the following report appears:

Eine Schlafende auf einem Bett, das des Abends durch alabasterne Lampen sanft beleuchtet wurde und hinter demselben ertont die entziickendste Musik, die fur den Ort und die Vorstellung eigens komponiert wurde.41

Beethoven composed some pieces for Flotenuhr (WoO 33). The first, an Adagio assai in F, is the best known and it perfectly depicts the image of a sleeping girl. The second is a Scherzo in G major, the third an Allegro in G major. (The fourth and fifth are respectively Allegro non piu molto and Allegretto (Minuetto). They are perhaps composed for piano.) More interesting is the Grenadiermarsch for Flotenuhr (Hess 107), written somewhere between 1809 and 1819, and described by G. Kinsky in his article Beethoven und die Flotenuhr: mit einem ungedruckten Marsch des Meisters written in 1927.42 This march was transcribed to a roll for Flotenuhr and was preserved in the Heyer Museum in Cologne (rif. Roll 7, No. 2061). The first two sections, consisting of 20 bars, are not Beethoven’s, but were composed by Haydn and transcribed by Peter Niemecz. This is an interesting twist of history, since Haydn himself wrote music for Flotenuhr (Hob. XIX: 1/6). The rather limited quality of the music aside, Beethoven’s favour towards this type of mechanical instrument shows him to have been well in touch with the wider cultural Zeitgeist of the late 18th century and the first part of the 19th.

The friendship between Beethoven and the “Hofmaschinist” Johann Malzel (Malzl) (1772-1838) is well documented. The term “machinist” usually referred to an inventor of musical clocks. In fact Maelzel manufactured automata, Flotenuhren, and the well-known Panharmonicon. Beethoven allegedly composed the piece.

Wellingtons Sieg (The “Battle Symphony”, op. 91) specifically to be played on this behemoth mechanical orchestral organ in celebration of the Duke of Wellington’s victory over the French at the Battle of Vittoria. Rewritten for orchestra, it was first performed in 1813 and later caused a bitter conflict between the two men, when Malzel claimed ownership of the piece. Previously, during less contentious times, Malzel had constructed several ear trumpets to attempt to help Beethoven with his hearing.43

The Panharmonicon44 could imitate all the regular orchestral instruments as well as produce sound effects such as gunfire and cannon shots. To judge from the two surviving photographs, preserved in Alexander Buchner’s seminal monograph, Vom Glockenspiel zum Pianola, the style of the Panharmonicon was similar to many later mechanical orchestras, with pinned barrels storing the note information, and a variety of pipes and percussion producers. Prince Esterhazy may have been wealthy enough to employ Josef Haydn and his merry men, but orchestrators provided the lower strata of fashionable society with a neat and uncomplaining substitute for hungry musicians.

In 1815, Malzel constructed and patented a portable metronome, to this day known as Malzel’s Metronome. The metronome had been invented earlier (about 1812) by Dietrich Nikolaus Winkel, and Malzel used several of Winkel’s construction ideas. The metronome is an instrument that was originally pyramid-shaped, with a clockwork pendulum mechanism used to indicate the exact tempo in which a work should be performed. It has a double pendulum whose pace can be altered by sliding the upper weight up or down. The sliding bob indicates the rate of oscillation by means of calibrations on the pendulum. The system was so simple and perfect that it was not subjected to modification until the 1970s when the introduction of electronics consigned the clockwork metronome to antiquity, if not complete disuse.

Ludwig van Beethoven was the first well-known composer to indicate specific metronome markings in his music, as reported in a table entitled Die Tempo’s sammtlicher Satze aller Symphonien des Hrn L. v. Beethoven vom Verf selbst nach Maelzels Metronom bestimmt from issue no. 51 of the Allgemeine musikalische Zei-tung,A5 dated 17 December 1817, but many performances of his music still vary widely from his tempo indications, particularly in slow movements.

In conclusion it can be said that Beethoven, during his life, was a man of contemporary eighteenth-century culture, both in his music and in his private life, choosing a watch a vergue (typical of the 18th century), appreciating the Spieluhr and the mechanical organ, using antiquated spectacles and wearing big neckties a la Titus.

Notes

1
TDR 5, p. 579.
2
For a first and preliminary description of Beethoven’s watches see Armando Orlandi: Beethoven et l’art de l’horologerie, Beethoven, in: Beethoven, la revue de l’Association Beethoven France, Nr. 4,2005, pp. 34-39
3
Accession Number: M/P.l & A & B-1929 (Applied Arts Department); Reference Number: 77467.
4
The Museum Poldi Pozzoli in Milan owns a pocket watch donated by Bruno Falk in 1973, made by Prior and contemporary with that of Beethoven.
5
Beethoven-Haus Bonn, Stephan Ley: Beethoven-Ikonographie, Band VI, Nr. 1141.
6
Beethoven-Haus Bonn, shelf mark B 738/a-b-c.
7
Ley wrote the following note: “Taschenuhr // Original // Frau E. Guttsche, Doberan”.
8
Fuhrer durch die Beethoven-Zentenarausstellung der Stadt Wien: Beethoven und die Wiener Kultur seiner Zeit, Wien 1927, p. 102.
9
Zmeskall was an excellent cellist and a close friend of Beethoven, as is revealed through a large number of correspondences
10
Jean Etienne Piot was born in 1758, son of the watch maker Jean David, active in Geneva; his firm was merged with the one of Francis Panchaud, probably around 1779-1780, and later with Jean Adam Panchaud from 1790 to 1801 circa.
11
Schindler/Beethoven III 2, p. 372.
12
Katalog der mit der Beethoven-Feier zu Bonn am 11.-15. Mai 1890 verbundenenAusstellung von Hand -schriften, Briefen, Bildnissen, Reliquien Ludwig van Beethoven’s sowie sonstigen auf ihn und seine Familie bezuglichen Erinnerungen, Bonn 1890, p. 30.
13
Verein Beethoven-Haus in Bonn: Bericht uber die ersten funfzehn Jahre seines Bestehens 1889-1904, Bonn 1904, p. 66.
14
Ibid., p. 65.
15
The Heiligenstadter Beethoven-collection that was taken over by the Wien Museum in 1896 consisted of more than 300 objects. The clock has the Inv. Nr. 116.421.
16
Luigi Bellofatto: Beethovens letzte Lebensstunden und das Schwarzspanierhaus. Einige neue Erkennt-nisse aus dem Nachlass von Alexander Wheelock Thayer, in: BBS 6 (2207), pp. 7-32.
17
Die Moderne Welt 11 (1920), Nr. 9, p. 7.
18
Fuhrer durch die Beethoven-Ausstellung der Stadt Wien, Wien 1920, p. 47.
19
Alfred Christlieb Kalischer: Aus dem Schwarzspanierhause: Erinnerungen an L. van Beethoven aus seiner Jugendzeit von Gerhard von Breuning, Berlin-Leipzig 1907, p. 45.
20
Fuhrer durch die Beethoven-Zentenarausstellung der Stadt Wien: Beethoven und die Wiener Kultur seiner Zeit, Wien 1927, pp. 89-90.
21
The authors would be interested to receive any further information about this clock, which would be of much value towards the continuing research on Beethoven’s clocks.
22
BKh 1, p. 41.
23
BKh 1, p. 83.
24
BKh 1, p. 97.
25
It is interesting to compare the prices of watches with prices of other items, which were always reported by Beethoven in his conversation books of the same year: a razor cost 5 f., a hat 15 f. A journey from Modling to Vienna cost 8 f., much more than the average price of a book (from 3 to 8 f.).
26
BGA 869.
27
BGA944.
28
Inventory from Ludwig van Beethoven’s hand, Beethoven-Haus Bonn, collection of H.C. Bodmer, HCB Br 278.
29
Alexander Wheelock Thayer: Ludwig van Beethoven’s Leben, vol. 3, Berlin 1879, p. 506.
30
BGA 927. Dr. Anton Pachler was a lawyer and the brother of Dr. Karl, who married the amateur pianist and great admirer of Beethoven, Marie Leopoldine Koschak
31
Kaspar Karl lived with his wife Johanna on the Vorstadt Alsergrund no. 121.
32
This painting was made in 1806. There are two versions of it: one originates from the possession of the Lichnowsky family and family tradition claims it to have been made by the order of Beethoven’s patron Prince Karl von Lichnowsky. The second version was made for the Hungarian aristocratic family Brunsvik, who were also close friends of Beethoven’s. The two versions differ from each other mainly in the coloring of the clothes, and in one little detail: in the Brunsvik version, a ribbon on the front of Beethoven’s shirt can be seen, on which a lorgnon (monocle) must hang. This ribbon (it has sometimes been interpreted as a watch chain in literature) is missing on the painting belonging to the Lichnowsky family.
33
Max Unger: Die Beethovenbilder von Neugass, in: Zeitschrift fur Musik, 102 (1935), p. 1212.
34
For more information on A. W. Thayer’s life, see Luigi Bellofatto: Alexander Wheelock Thayer. Neue Quellen zu Person und Werk, in: BBS 5 (2006), pp. 7-69.
35
“In testimony whereof I hereunto set my hand in the presence of three witnesses, and declare this to be my last will, Alexander Wheelock Thayer, on this twenty-sixth day of January 1897”
36
It has been recently checked and repaired by Armando Orlandi; it was shown at the Special Exhibition on A. W. Thayer at the Beethoven-Haus Bonn (19th May to 5th September 2010): “Dedicated to Beethoven, the MAN” Beethoven’s biographer Alexander Wheelock Thayer.
37
The history of the watchmakers Sandoz begins in 1530 with the birth of Johannus Sandoz di Lode, at NeucMtel in Switzerland. In 1870, Henry Sandoz founded the company Odin with Jules E. Sandoz, becoming the first family watchmakers. Their intention and scope was to manufacture repeater and chronograph watches and they then went on to become pioneers in the standardization of their product. In 1920 the company Henry Sandoz changed its name to Henry Sandoz & Fils when Henry’s son Hermann joined the business. In 1926 Henry Sandoz & Fils moved its factory to Le Chaux-de-Fonds, in the canton of NeucMtel. Towards the end of the 1920s the Sandoz company expanded and became very well-known, extending its business as far as India and Pakistan and manufacturing more than one million watches per year. In 1938 the company changed its name again to H. Sandoz & Co, and then to Bezzola &      Kocher until 1971, when it settled upon the definitive name of Compagnie des Montres Sandoz S.A. which is still in use today.
38
BKh 2, p. 142.
39
BKh 2, p. 241.
40
Charles Perregaux: Les Jaquet-Droz et leurs automates, Neuchatel 1906.
41
Theodor von Frimmel: Beethoven-Handbuch, Leipzig 1926, vol. 1, p. 434.
42
Beethoven-Almanach der Deutschen Musikbucherei auf das Jahr 1927, hg. von Gustav Bosse, 1927, pp. 320-332.
43
Malzel also constructed a trumpet automaton and a speaking doll with moving eyes.
44
The information on this instrument is very scarce, but it seems to have been one of a number of pan-harmonicons. One was sold in Paris in 1807, one was taken on a tour to the New World, but sank somewhere between Havana and Philadelphia on 21 July 1838 along with its creator, and one survived at the Industrial Museum in Stuttgart until it succumbed to the ravages of the Second World War.
45
AmZ 19 (1819), Nr. 50 vom 10. Dezember 1817, pp. 873-874.