Posts

Pages

Treatise of Harmony and Composition – Part Three – Chapter 1

Treaty of Harmony and Composition – Part Three

CHAPTER I – ESSAY ON THE FUGUE.

Of imitation.

This branch of scientific composition ought properly to be called the preparatory school of the fugue. The rules to be observed are very much less strict than those applied to the real fugue or canon. It is indeed only necessary to take a theme, or subject, in one or perhaps two of the parts, and to imitate it in another part, as may be most convenient. The distance of the intervals taken, by ascent or descent, as also the regularity of the progressions and the correct involution of the parts, need not be so carefully considered; it is also permissible to combine with the leading subject other analogous ideas. For these reasons imitation is an artifice very available in the florid style of composition, on account of its efficient aid in carrying out a subject in a workmanlike manner, and giving an air of unity to the whole piece by means of the similarity which one leading idea is made to bear to another. Imitation is a sort of graceful counterfeit of the fugue, and, if cleverly used, makes no bad substitute for it.

A partial or periodic imitation may be used upon any selection of intervals, as will be seen by the following examples.

There are also some other kinds of imitation (artifices, or rather toys of invention upon which our ancestors set great value, as if they were pieces of real art); viz.: the inversion, strict and free; the retrograding; the inversion backwards; the augmented; the diminished; the interrupted; and the imitation upon the false accent of the bar (in arsi et thesi). My mentor said to me, lately, that if I desired more particular information upon these knotty points, I had better apply to old Marpurg: I can’t say that I have any great curiosity; I can easily imagine what such intricacies are, and will make use of them if I find a fitting opportunity. If, in a composition of mine, the subject allows of inversion, well and good — if not, it is just as good without that capability.

Page taken from: Louis van Beethoven’s Studies in Thorough-Bass, Counterpoint and the Art of Scientific Composition, Collected from the autograph posthumous manuscripts of the great composer, and first published, together with biographical notices, by Ignatius von Seyfried. Translated and edited by Henry Hugh Pierson (Edgar Mannsfeldt). With Beethoven’s portrait, and other illustrative plates. Schuberth and Co. Leipzig, Hamburgh and New‑York. 1853.