Unv.10 Biamonti 637. Sketches for a Trio for violin, cello and piano in F minor

Unv. 10, formerly Biamonti 637, comprises sketches for the first and final movements of a piano trio for violin, cello, and piano in F minor, dating from 1815. These span pages 86 to 107 of the manuscript (Nottebohm, II, p. 345). The trio has attracted scholarly and practical attention: Albert Willem Holsbergen has created an insightful reconstruction, which can be heard on www.unheardbeethoven.org, and the work has also been studied by the distinguished musicologist William Kinderman, who provides an MP3 excerpt on the University of Illinois website.

The description provided on www.unheardbeethoven.org reads as follows:

The year 1815 saw several large-scale Beethoven works that never reached completion. Among these was the abandoned Piano Concerto No. 6, Hess 15, documented elsewhere on the site. Another is this Piano Trio, whose surviving sketches reveal a work unlike any other by Beethoven. Perhaps the composer abandoned it because it was too unconventional. It begins with a slow introduction in which the piano presents a flowing triplet arpeggio, while the strings respond with a mournful phrase punctuated by sharp, almost painful rests. The piano struggles against the strings’ sorrowful character, and gradually the music takes on a tone of bitter defiance, as a short four-note motif begins to assert itself, driving the music toward a violent Allegro in which this motif emerges as the first theme.

The gradual development of the main theme recalls the opening of the first movement of the Ninth Symphony. Yet while the Symphony evokes the creation of the universe, in this Trio the effect is far more modest, suggesting merely the tentative first steps of our ancestral hominids across the African plains. Interestingly, the tonal relationships play a crucial role in both works: F minor to D-flat major in this Trio, and D minor to B-flat major in the Ninth Symphony. Here, in Biamonti 637, this tonal interplay appears even more pronounced, indicating Beethoven’s engagement with abstract musical ideas that would only later be fully realised in the Ninth.

From the start of the Allegro, the autograph largely consists of melodic sketches, tracing themes and motifs from one instrument to another. The material extends coherently for roughly 130 bars, after which several pencilled sketches, appearing discontinuous, are added.

The original manuscript, Grasnick 29, is held at the Berlin Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz. Willem Holsbergen has produced a full realisation of a large-scale movement based on this score, incorporating additional sketches from the Scheide Sketchbook, also held by William Scheide. Recordings of Willem’s completion are available in MP3 format, performed both by The Unheard Beethoven and by composer Gerd Prengel. The full score of Holsbergen’s realisation can be downloaded for study, under copyright The Unheard Beethoven, Inc. (BMI). Thanks are due to the SPK and Mr Scheide for providing access to the sketch materials.

Most of the surviving sketches can be found in the “Scheide” notebook and on the pages associated with it. Beethoven initially used this notebook until around May 1816, but he likely returned to it in the summer and early autumn to prepare further sketches, created concurrently with the draft of the first movement score (see photographs, Grasnick 29a). Nicholas Marston considers it plausible that Beethoven suspended work on the piano trio from June to August, favouring the composition of the Piano Sonata Op. 101, and only afterwards produced the additional sketches and surviving drafts for the piano trio. In two entries of Beethoven’s diary (Tagebuch), namely “im trio endigen” and “Beeilung mit dem Trio” (“finishing the trio” and “hurry with the trio”), Marston hypothesises that Beethoven was still working on the piano trio in September 1816 (Marston, Piano Trio, pp. 238–240; Solomon, Tagebuch II, pp. 72f).

On 1 October 1816, Beethoven offered the trio to the English publisher Robert Birchall in London for £50 as a new work (BGA 982), but without success (BGA 996). Birchall was no longer interested, reportedly irritated by the way Beethoven conducted his business affairs (TDR III, p. 547).

The reason why Beethoven abandoned work on the piano trio remains unclear. External factors may have included failed publishing negotiations, illness, or the prolonged dispute over the guardianship of his nephew, but stylistic considerations may also have played a role (Kinderman, Piano Trio, pp. 36–41; Marston, Piano Trio, pp. 266–269).

It is possible that Beethoven was referring to this piano trio when, on 19 May 1818, he offered Ferdinand Ries a new trio for which he intended to seek a publisher in London (BGA 1258).

Provenance: Friedrich August Grasnick, Berlin, acquired in 1896. Facsimile: SBB/microfiche. Facsimile reference 1: Kinderman, Piano Trio, pp. 17f. Additional facsimile: BGA Vol. 4, p. 189. Complete transcription: Marston, Piano Trio. Transcription sheets 1–3: Kinderman, Piano Trio. Description: Bartlitz, catalogue.

Draft score/sketches of the first movement, mm. 130–151: GB-Lbl, Add. Ms. 29997, folio 20. For long stretches, only individual parts are notated, following folio 4v of the previous source.

Format: single folio; two pages of musical text. Paper: horizontal format, double-spaced.

Provenance: Johann Nepomuk Kafka, Vienna, acquired in 1876. Facsimile folio 20r: Marston, Piano Trio, p. 233. Description: Marston, Piano Trio.

Documents concerning the work: BGA 982, 996, 1258.

Bibliography: Kinderman, Klaviertrio; Marston, Klaviertrio; Nottebohm, Beethoveniana II, p. 345.