Unv.14 – Fragment of Piano Variations

(Fischhof, folios 25/26 verso)

Sketched at the end of 1794 or the beginning of 1795. The sketches are contained on three leaves of the Fischhof sketchbook and probably represent a theme, eight variations, and a coda.

On folio 25 recto of the notebook, immediately after the variations, there is a brief sketch for the first movement of the Piano Sonata in A major, Op. 2 No. 2. This has led some to suppose that Beethoven may have considered a set of variations as the finale of that sonata. Both this hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis of an independent set of variations remain plausible.

Further variations in A major — therefore in the same key and with the same tempo indication — appear in the “Kafka” miscellany (GB‑Lhl, Add. Ms. 29801, fol. 158v), although they probably refer to “Là ci darem la mano” from Mozart’s Don Giovanni, which is certainly not the subject of the variations in the Fischhof.

Unv.14 – Fragment of Piano Variations

Study of a Possible Reconstruction – by Maestro Graziano Denini

INTRODUCTION

Attempting to reconstruct a coherent musical idea from a Theme with 8 Variations and a final Coda — whose sketches are scattered across three pages of Beethoven’s manuscript — is no simple task. I wish therefore to clarify that my reworking can only be considered a hypothesis of transcription, and that many other, perhaps better, interpretations could be proposed.

One of the difficulties I always encounter when analysing Beethoven’s manuscripts is the absence of key signatures at the beginning of the staves. Beethoven rarely wrote the key signature at the start of each system; more often he simply implied it. At times this practice makes deciphering difficult — even more so in a Theme and Variations where the character and mood shift frequently. Occasionally I have identified a minor mode solely from the otherwise unnecessary presence of a G‑sharp.

I will therefore share my working method.

First, I transcribed — as faithfully as possible — all the sketches that could relate to this work and that appear on three leaves of the Fischhof sketchbook (facsimiles are reproduced on this page).

Second, I sought the fragments closest to one another in character or motion; I then began positioning them within a hypothetical Variation, adding missing notes here and there (below I illustrate, Variation by Variation, the results I obtained), while trying to use as much of the material as possible.

At this point, having a clearer view of the Variations and their thematic idea, I asked myself what the original Theme might have been. I believe the answer is that they refer to the Bagatelle in A major, WoO 213 No. 4, which should be slightly earlier. The key is the same, and the first six notes of the Bagatelle correspond exactly to those of Variation No. 6 (except that they are written in doubled values and in 4/4). The figure E–F♯–E in the middle of the Bagatelle also appears among the fragments of the minor‑mode Variation.

(For our work on this composition and the other three forming WoO 213: Four Bagatelles in D‑flat major, G major, A major, and A major.)

I therefore rewrote the entire Bagatelle in 2/4, halving all note values so that it would correspond more closely to Beethoven’s sketches for the Variations. The Bagatelle includes a Da Capo but has no ending; I therefore repeated the first eight measures (ABA form) and added a concluding bar derived from the ending of Variation 6, which is the closest to the Theme.

Finally, I redistributed the Variations in an order that seemed to me the most coherent.

I hope that my work — again, a hypothetical reconstruction of the eight Variations — will not prove disagreeable to Beethoven enthusiasts. In any case, it has been a valuable “exercise in style.”

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE VARIATIONS

Theme

As stated in the introduction, I believe the Theme of these Variations derives from the Bagatelle in A major, WoO 213 No. 4. These four Bagatelles, dating from 1793, have recently been included in the new Kinsky–Halm catalogue. They are sketches already catalogued by Giovanni Biamonti in 1968, though erroneously dated to 1800. Beethoven used a type of paper associated with compositions from 1793 (I thank my friend Luigi Bellofatto for this valuable historical‑analytical contribution).

Mark Zimmer informs us that these Bagatelles are found together with the Allemande WoO 81, the Anglaise WoO 212, the Bagatelle Hess 60, two nearly complete Bagatelles (Biamonti 269 and 277), and numerous sketches (Biamonti 268–270, 271–274, 276, 278–281) on two leaves in the Beethoven‑Archiv in Bonn, SBH 631 (SV 88).

Variation I

Found on folio 26 recto (staves 1–4). It is essentially complete; my contribution was limited to adding a few notes in the empty passages, mostly doubling the left hand. Note the unusual harmony of the last three measures, which seems to veer toward B minor before returning to A major.

Variation II

Based on the sketch on folio 26 recto (staves 15–16), continuing on folio 26 verso (staves 1–6). It is built on right/left imitations. It is fully developed; my intervention was limited to filling in missing parts of Beethoven’s original.

Variation III

Based on two sketches on folio 25 verso (staves 9–10). Note the indication “6——–” in measures 3–4 of the second sketch, showing how the left hand should proceed. The first three measures are complete; I added the lower parts to allow repetition. I also added semiquaver octaves as a link between the first and second fragment. The second fragment is complete; I added missing notes at the end to allow repetition and a few left‑hand notes to connect back to the first fragment. Finally, I added a descending scale in the left hand to conclude the Variation.

Variation IV

Based on the fragment on folio 25 verso (staves 11–14). No mode change is specified, but the G‑sharp in the penultimate measure of the sketch led me to interpret it in A minor. The theme consists of four measures (which I repeated with open–closed endings) plus two measures for the second part. Because of the scant material, I had to invent almost the entire second part, resolving it with a slightly varied repetition of the second fragment. The left hand is almost entirely missing except for the first and last two measures. The theme is marked “con ottave.”

Variation V

Based on the sketch on folio 26 verso (staves 5–8). It is practically complete. My contribution was limited to repeating the first three measures (suggested by the continuation sign), adding accented quarter notes (also suggested by the manuscript), and adding left‑hand notes mirroring the right. At measure 8 I added repeated notes to connect the two parts.

Variation VI

Sketches appear on folio 26 recto (staves 11–12), folio 25 verso (staves 11–12), and folio 26 recto (staves 5–8). The opening resembles the beginning of the Bagatelle. My additions in the first fragment are limited to the left hand in measure 4 and a different closing for the repetition (measure 7). The second fragment is complete but very fragmented: Beethoven indicates only the demisemiquaver motion, alternating between hands, leaving the other hand blank. I filled in the missing harmony and ended with a descending left‑hand scale and a fermata linking to the third fragment. The third fragment lacks the left hand entirely; I resolved it with a rapid, agitated progression leading to a second suspension and a soft final cadence. In the penultimate measure I added contrary motion to the ascending right‑hand scale. In the last measure I added a cadential left hand (this cadence inspired the final cadence of the Theme).

Variation VII

Begins with the sketch on folio 26 recto (staves 15–16), followed by two measures from folio 25 verso (staves 15–16), and concludes with the fragment on folio 26 verso (staves 9–10). This is the easiest Variation to identify, given the left‑hand sextuplets and the alternation of triplets and quadruplets in the right hand. The left hand follows the indication to repeat the Alberti‑bass pattern found in the first measure. At the fourth measure, third beat, I added a descending A‑major arpeggio, echoing the original on folio 25 verso. This connects to the next sketch, where I again repeated the left‑hand pattern. To conclude, I added an ascending A‑major arpeggio in the left hand, ending on the same note as the right.

Variation VIII

Based on sketches on folio 26 recto (staves 13–14, 15–16) and folio 26 verso (staves 11–12). In the first sketch the left hand begins with real notes, then continues with the indication “ottave.” The second measure is missing (with continuation sign). The fragment is otherwise complete; I added two concluding notes in the right hand at measure 10. The second fragment is also nearly complete; I added a descending A‑major arpeggio in the right hand at measures 17–18. Compositionally, I reused the first four measures of the second fragment and concluded with the closing of the first, in crescendo.

Coda

Based on fragments on folio 26 recto (staves 7–12) and folio 26 verso (staves 11–14). In the first fragment, built on right/left alternation and imitation, I added several parts, drawing on figures from the original. The abrupt interruption at measure 8 suggested a cadential passage: I added a fermata and continued with three slower measures, also with crescendo and final fermata.

The next fragment (folio 26 recto, stave 14) seemed to me insufficiently characteristic for such a piece. I therefore used an unused sketch from folio 26 recto (staves 11–14), whose descending left‑hand scales, taken at an Allegro tempo and with a “deciso” character, seemed far more conclusive.