Biamonti 233 – a) Fragment in D major, b) Minuet in A-flat major, c) Fragment in D-flat major Landsberg 7 Notebook, Page 33, Staves 1–4, 3–4, and 5–6. Measures: 9, 8/4, and 3. (Mikulicz Page 29). 1800

The musical examples and texts on this page are by Graziano Denini

Biamonti 233 – a) Fragment in D major, b) Minuet in A-flat major, c) Fragment in D-flat major

Landsberg 7 Notebook, Page 33, Staves 1–4, 3–4, and 5–6. Measures: 9, 8/4, and 3. (Mikulicz Page 29). 1800

These three fragments, occupying staves 1 through 6 of this page, are brief thematic ideas or annotations for other works Beethoven was studying at the time. The remainder of the page is blank.

a) Fragment in A-flat major

Located on staves 1–4, comprising 9 measures, this is a canon at the octave between the right and left hands. Both hands move in descending sixteenth-note scales in thirds.

Noteworthy details include:

  • The emphasis on accidentals in the upbeat of the first measure and in the corresponding canon of the left hand.
  • The absence of repeated naturals on E in measures 5 and 6.
  • The diminished third interval (E♮–D♭) in measure 6, which is not replicated in measure 8 (or perhaps it is, as in measures 5–6?).

b) Minuet in A-flat major

Located on staves 3–6, comprising 8 + 4 measures with repeat signs and a “da capo” indication.

Biamonti erroneously attributes this entire fragment—the longest and most complete on the page—only to staves 3–4. In reality, it extends across the next two staves as well.

The formal structure of this Minuet is thus: AABABA → (8 + 8 + 4 + 8 + 4 + 8 measures)

c) Fragment in D-flat major

Located on staves 5–6, comprising 3 measures.

This fragment consists of a seventh chord arpeggio, with added notes, mirrored between the two hands. The key is not indicated (Biamonti suggests D-flat major), so it could be interpreted differently.

Given that the two preceding fragments are in A-flat major, I would also consider this third fragment to be in the same tonal sphere.

It may be a sketch for an accompaniment to the Violin and Piano Sonata Op. 24; similar fragments appear on page 29, staff 9, and pertain to the first movement of that Sonata.

Clicca qui per aggiungere il proprio testo

Clicca qui per aggiungere il proprio testo

Karl L. Mikulicz: A Pioneer in Beethoven Sketchbook Studies

Karl L. Mikulicz was a distinguished early 20th-century scholar whose name is closely associated with the publication and decipherment of Beethoven’s sketchbooks, particularly the Landsberg 7 manuscript. His work is notable for its methodical reproduction of Beethoven’s jottings, which he approached with both philological rigor and editorial sensitivity.

In a 1927 facsimile edition, Mikulicz published the Landsberg 7 sketchbook, a crucial source containing early material for works such as the String Quartets Op. 18. His edition remains one of the earliest attempts to present Beethoven’s sketches in a faithful visual format, preserving the layout, ink density, and even the smudges and corrections that reveal Beethoven’s compositional process.

Mikulicz advocated what he called the “ideal solution” for sketchbook publication: A complete facsimile reproduction accompanied by a detailed decipherment and commentary, allowing scholars to compare the original manuscript with a modern transcription and analytical notes.

This approach was later echoed by institutions such as the Beethoven-Haus in Bonn and the Glinka Museum in Moscow, which continued the tradition of publishing Beethoven’s sketchbooks in multi-volume editions combining facsimile, transcription, and commentary. Though Mikulicz may not be widely known outside specialist circles, his contribution laid the groundwork for modern Beethoven research, especially in the study of unrealized fragments and compositional evolution.